The Influence Of Digital Technology Adoption, Product Innovation, And Fiscal Policy On The Performance Improvement Of Micro, Small, And Medium Enterprises (MSMES) In The Digital Economy Era In East Kalimantan

Muhammad  Tommy Fimi Putera; Hwihanus Hwihanus; Muhammad Harits Zidni Khatib Ramadhani

doi:10.63922/ijbqr.v3i04.2449

Muhammad Tommy Fimi Putera Universitas Mulawarman
Hwihanus Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Muhammad Harits Zidni Khatib Ramadhani Universitas Mulawarman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63922/ijbqr.v3i04.2449

Keywords: Digitalization, Innovation, Fiscal Policy, MSME Performance

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of digitalization, innovation, and fiscal policy on the performance of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in East Kalimantan Province.1 The background of this research is based on the importance of digital transformation and government fiscal policy support in enhancing the competitiveness and productivity of MSMEs in the modern economic era.1 The research method used is quantitative with a multiple linear regression approach.1 Data were obtained by distributing questionnaires to 120 MSME actors in several regencies/cities in East Kalimantan.1 The analysis results indicate that the variables of digitalization (X₁), innovation (X₂), and fiscal policy (X₃) have a positive and significant influence on MSME performance (Y), both partially and simultaneously.1 The t-test shows that all three variables have a significance value of < 0.05, while the F-test results show an F-statistic of 45.762 with a significance of 0.000, indicating that the regression model is simultaneously significant.1 The coefficient of determination (R²) value is 0.685, which means that 68.5% of the variation in MSME performance can be explained by these three variables, while the remaining 31.5% is influenced by other factors outside the model.1 These findings indicate that enhancing digital capabilities, strengthening product and service innovation, and fiscal policy support such as government incentives and guidance play a crucial role in boosting MSME performance in East Kalimantan.1 Therefore, collaboration between the government, MSME actors, and financial institutions needs to be strengthened to create an adaptive, innovative, and sustainable business ecosystem.

References

Adi, R. S. (2023). Digitalisasi UMKM di Era Ekonomi 4.0: Tantangan dan Peluang. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. Agustina,
D., & Sari, M. P. (2022). Pengaruh Inovasi Produk dan Teknologi Digital terhadap Kinerja UMKM di Masa Pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kewirausahaan, 20(2), 145–156.
Aini, L. N., & Ramadhan, A. (2024). Peran Digitalisasi terhadap Daya Saing UMKM di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Inovasi, 9(1), 33–45.
Astuti, P., & Widodo, S. (2023). Kebijakan Fiskal dalam Mendukung Pemulihan Ekonomi Nasional: Dampaknya terhadap UMKM. Jurnal Kebijakan Ekonomi Indonesia, 12(3), 201–215.
Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2024). Statistik UMKM Indonesia 2024. Jakarta: BPS RI.
Bank Indonesia. (2023). Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan Regional Provinsi Kalimantan Timur Triwulan IV 2023. Samarinda: BI Kaltim.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hamdani, M., & Yusuf, R. (2022). Pengaruh Inovasi Produk terhadap Peningkatan Kinerja UMKM di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Kontemporer, 10(1), 55–68. Kaplan,
R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard—Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.
Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. London: Macmillan.
Rahman, F., & Syafitri, D. (2023). Analisis Implementasi Teknologi Digital terhadap Produktivitas UMKM. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 11(2), 88–102.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). Economics of the Public Sector (3rd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tambunan, T. (2019). Pembangunan Ekonomi dan Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah di Indonesia. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Wulandari, N., & Pratama, I. (2024). Transformasi Digital dan Dampaknya terhadap Kinerja UMKM di Kalimantan Timur. Jurnal Pembangunan Daerah, 5(1), 25–38.
Zahara, S., & Utami, N. (2023). Pengaruh Kebijakan Pemerintah dan Adopsi Teknologi terhadap Kinerja UMKM Pasca Pandemi. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik dan Inovasi, 8(2), 112–125.