Strengthening Legal Protection for Indonesian Fisheries Exports in International Trade

  • La Ilman Magister Ilmu Hukum, Syekh-Yusuf Islamic University, Tangerang - Banten
  • M. Umar Kelibia Magister Ilmu Hukum, Syekh-Yusuf Islamic University, Tangerang - Banten
  • Ide Raunas Magister Ilmu Hukum, Syekh-Yusuf Islamic University, Tangerang - Banten,
  • Harmoko Harmoko Magister Ilmu Hukum, Syekh-Yusuf Islamic University, Tangerang - Banten
  • Raden Giri Magister Ilmu Hukum, Syekh-Yusuf Islamic University, Tangerang - Banten
  • Annie Myranika Magister Ilmu Hukum, Syekh-Yusuf Islamic University, Tangerang - Banten
Keywords: International Trade Law, Fisheries Exports, Legal Protection, Indonesia, Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures

Abstract

This study examines the importance of strengthening legal protection for Indonesian fisheries exports within the framework of international trade. As one of the world’s largest producers of marine resources, Indonesia holds significant potential in the global fisheries market. However, the competitiveness of its fisheries exports is often constrained by complex international regulations, including sanitary and phytosanitary standards, traceability requirements, and sustainability certifications imposed by importing countries. These regulatory challenges highlight the critical role of international trade law in shaping market access and export performance. This research adopts a normative juridical approach, analyzing international legal instruments, trade agreements, and national regulatory frameworks relevant to fisheries exports. The findings reveal that while existing legal frameworks provide opportunities for market expansion, gaps in regulatory alignment, enforcement mechanisms, and institutional capacity limit their effectiveness. Additionally, issues such as illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing, as well as environmental compliance, pose significant legal risks for Indonesian exporters. The study emphasizes the need for harmonization between domestic regulations and international standards, as well as the strengthening of institutional governance and compliance mechanisms. Enhancing legal protection is essential to ensure sustainable fisheries practices, improve export competitiveness, and secure Indonesia’s position in the global seafood market.

 

Keywords: International Trade Law; Fisheries Exports; Legal Protection; Indonesia; Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures

References

Agnew, D. J., Pearce, J., Pramod, G., Peatman, T., Watson, R., Beddington, J. R., & Pitcher, T. J. (2009). Estimating the worldwide extent of illegal fishing. PLoS ONE, 4(2), e4570. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004570
Cadot, O., Gourdon, J., & van Tongeren, F. (2018). Estimating ad valorem equivalents of non-tariff measures: Combining price-based and quantity-based approaches. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f3cd5bdc-en
Evenett, S. J., & Fritz, J. (2019). Going it alone? Trade policy after three years of populism. Global Trade Alert. https://www.globaltradealert.org
Hoekman, B., & Kostecki, M. (2009). The political economy of the world trading system (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2022). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2022. FAO. https://www.fao.org
OECD. (2020). Trade and environmental sustainability. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org
Rodrik, D. (2018). What do trade agreements really do? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(2), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.2.73
UNCTAD. (2021). Digital economy report 2021: Cross-border data flows and development. United Nations. https://unctad.org
World Trade Organization (WTO). (2023). World trade report 2023: Re-globalization for a secure, inclusive and sustainable future. WTO. https://www.wto.org
Published
2026-04-26
How to Cite
Ilman, L., Kelibia, M. U., Raunas, I., Harmoko, H., Giri, R., & Myranika, A. (2026). Strengthening Legal Protection for Indonesian Fisheries Exports in International Trade. International Journal of Business and Quality Research, 4(02), 233-244. https://doi.org/10.63922/ijbqr.v4i02.3259