The Effect of Work Environment on Employee Performance Mediated by Job Satisfaction and Work Motivation at the Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila (BPIP)

Bayu Trifiansyah; I Ketut R Sudiarditha; Christian Wiradendi Wolor

doi:10.63922/ijebir.v4i04.2068

Bayu Trifiansyah Faculty of Economics, Jakarta State University, Indonesia.
I Ketut R Sudiarditha Faculty of Economics, Jakarta State University, Indonesia.
Christian Wiradendi Wolor Faculty of Economics, Jakarta State University, Indonesia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63922/ijebir.v4i04.2068

Keywords: Work Environment, Job Satisfaction, Work Motivation, Employee Performance

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of the work environment on employee performance by considering the mediating roles of job satisfaction and work motivation at the Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila (BPIP). The research is motivated by internal and external challenges faced by BPIP as a strategic non-ministerial institution, including budget efficiency policies, fluctuations in key performance indicators, and organizational restructuring. A quantitative method was employed using Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS). The sample consisted of BPIP employees selected through purposive sampling. The findings reveal that the work environment significantly affects both job satisfaction and work motivation. Job satisfaction has a significant effect on employee performance, while work motivation does not show a significant impact. The work environment also directly affects employee performance. Furthermore, job satisfaction partially mediates the relationship between the work environment and performance, while work motivation does not serve as a significant mediator. The practical implications highlight the importance of optimizing both physical and non-physical work environment factors to improve employee performance, with job satisfaction identified as a strategic pathway for HR policy development in the public sector.

References

Alshmemri, M., Shahwan-Akl, L., & Maude, P. (2017). Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory. Life Science Journal, 14(5), 12–16.
Ayunasrah, T., Ratnawati, R., Diana, R., & Ansari, A. (2022). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai dengan Kepuasan Kerja sebagai Variabel Mediasi pada Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Kabupaten Bener Meriah. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Manajemen, 4(1), 1–10.
Bernardin, H. J., & Russell, J. E. A. (1993). Human Resource Management: An Experiential Approach. McGraw-Hill.
Chandra, T. (2016). The Influence of Leadership Styles, Work Environment and Job Satisfaction of Employee Performance--Studies in the School of SMPN 10 Surabaya. International Education Studies, 9(1), 131-140.
Chandrasekar, K. (2011). Workplace environment and its impact on organizational performance in public sector organizations. International Journal of Enterprise Computing and Business Systems, 1(1), 1–19.
Haerofiatna, Erlangga, H., Mulyana, Y., Sunarsi, D., Solahudin, M., Dwiwarman, D. A., Waskita, N. I. D., ... & Purwanto, A. (2021). The effect of organizational commitment and work environment on job satisfaction and teachers performance. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(7), 109-117.
Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2014). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bumi Aksara.
Herzberg, F. (2003). One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees? Harvard Business Review, 81(1), 86–96.
Kahn, R. L., & Byosiere, C. L. (1960). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. In J. W. Newstrom (Ed.), Wiley Series in Organizational Psychology.
Lambert, E. G. (2004). The impact of job characteristics on correctional staff members. The Prison Journal, 84(2), 208–227.
Mangkunegara, A. A. P. (2005). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2010). Human Resource Management (13th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.
McClelland, D. C. (1961). The Achieving Society. Van Nostrand.
Nath Gangai, K., & Agrawal, R. (2015). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment: Is it important for employee performance. International Journal of Management and Business Research, 5(4), 269–278.
Paais, M., & Pattiruhu, J. R. (2020). Effect of motivation, leadership, and organizational culture on satisfaction and employee performance. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(8), 577–588.
Pawirosumarto, S., Sarjana, P. K., & Gunawan, R. (2017). The effect of work environment, leadership style, and organizational culture towards job satisfaction and its implication towards employee performance in Parador Hotels and Resorts, Indonesia. International journal of law and management, 59(6), 1337-1358.
Priansa, D. J. (2016). Perilaku Organisasi dalam Manajemen. Alfabeta.
Riyanto, S., Sutrisno, A., & Ali, H. (2017). The impact of working motivation and working environment on employees performance in Indonesia stock exchange. International Review of Management and Marketing, 7(3), 342-348.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior (17th ed.). Pearson Education.
Sedarmayanti. (2001). Tata kerja dan produktivitas kerja. Mandar Maju.
Srivastava, S. (2013). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment relationship: Effect of personality variables. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 17(2), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262912483529
Suryani, N. (2019). Pengaruh motivasi terhadap kepuasan kerja dan dampaknya terhadap kinerja karyawan. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 7(1), 12–21.
Vischer, J. C. (2007). The effects of the physical environment on job performance: Towards a theoretical model of workspace stress. Stress and Health, 23(3), 175–184.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and Motivation. Wiley.
Wahyudin, D., & Logahan, J. F. (2020). Lingkungan kerja dan motivasi pegawai: Kajian psikososial dalam organisasi pemerintahan. Jurnal Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi, 5(1), 45–58.