Productivity Analysis On Company Xyz Using The Production, Organization, Sales, Product, Arbeiter, Capital (Pospac) Method

  • Ida Ayu Kade Sintya Yulianti Dewi College Student, Department of Agricultural Industrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia.
  • I Ketut Satriawan Department of Agricultural Industrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia.
  • Lutfi Suhendra Department of Agricultural Industrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia.
Keywords: fishbone diagram, productivity index, arabica coffee, POSPAC

Abstract

XYZ company experienced raw material failures that did not meet the company’s quality standards from February to December 2024, resulting in a 10.1% decrease in production and the company continues to suffer losses. This study aims to: (1) measure the level of productivity in production, organization, sales, products, labor, and capital; (2) analyze the factors causing the low productivity index; and (3) provide improvement recommendations to increase the company’s productivity. The Production, Organization, Sales, Product, Arbeiter, and Capital (POSPAC) method is used to measure productivity, while the fishbone diagram is applied to identify and analyze problem causes. The results from January to December 2024 show the greatest decline occurred in the sales element in March -39.430, while the smallest decline was in the product element in January -0.230. The key factors contributing to low productivity are inconsistent raw material quality, absence of quality control, lack of training and competency development, and no HR development programs related to finance. To enhance productivity, the company should establish raw material standards (color, aroma, moisture content), create a coffee quality control SOP based on these standards, conduct training to improve competencies in production, finance and assess the quality of raw materials.

References

Coccia, M. (2020). Fishbone diagram for technological analysis and foresight. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 14(2-4), 225-247. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2020.111221
Damariandini, N., Harsojuwono, B. A., & Satriawan, I. K. (2023). Analisis produktivitas produksi keripik tempe “sagu” UD. Arya Putra Surabaya dengan mengunakan metode objective matrix (OMAX). Jurnal Rekayasa dan Manajemen Agroindustri, 11(3), 443-455. https://doi.org/10.24843/jrma.2023.v11.i03.p12
Ervil, R., & Rhamadan, D. Y. (2021). Productivity analysis using method Murvin E. Mundel case study PT. Johan Sentosa. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Kejuruan, 4(4), 107-110. https://doi.org/10.24036/jptk.v4i4.21523
Fradinata, E., Asmadi, D., & Zuherna, Z. (2023). Analisis produktivitas parsial menggunakan metode POSPAC pada CV. Tirta Bening Abadi. Jurnal Serambi Engineering, 8(4), 7446-7456. https://doi.org/10.32672/jse.v8i4.6962
Gartlehner, G., Schultes, M. T., Titscher, V., Morgan, L. C., Bobashev, G. V., Williams, P., & West, S. L. (2017). User testing of an adaptation of fishbone diagrams to depict results of systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0452-z.
Gaspersz, V. (1998). Manajemen Produktivitas Total: Strategi Peningkatan Bisnis Global. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Kohler, E. L. (1983). Kohler's Dictionary for Accountants. 6th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Mail, A., Alisyahbana, T., Saleh, A., Malik, R., & Ibrahim, I. (2018). Analisis produktivitas dengan metode objective matrix (OMAX) pada CV. Bintang Jaya. Journal of Industrial Engineering Management, 3(2), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.33536/jiem.v3i2.234
Mali, P. (1978). Improving Total Productivity. J. Wiley and Sons, New York.
Ronal, M. (2022). Analisis Produktivitas pada UD. Fika Jaya Kabupaten Tana Toraja. CEMERLANG : Jurnal Manajemen Dan Ekonomi Bisnis, 2(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.55606/cemerlang.v2i2.329
Pangaribuan, O. (2021). Analisis produktivitas parsial dan total dengan Metode POSPAC dan David J . Sumanth pada PT. Yunior Medan. Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi, 16(1), 32-46. https://ejurnal.istp.ac.id/index.php/jsti/article/download/108/110
Prabowo, R., & Aditia, R. (2020). Analisis produktivitas menggunakan metode POSPAC dan Performance Prism sebagai upaya peningkatan kinerja (Studi Kasus: industri baja tulangan di PT. X Surabaya). Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Industri, 9(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.26593/jrsi.v9i1.3362.11-22
Prakoso, I. (2022). Productivity Analysis of split stone production using objective matrix (Omax) method (A Case Study). Journal of Industrial Engineering and Halal Industries, 3(1), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.14421/jiehis.3498
Reyes, D. (2023). Industrial engineering: Enhancing efficiency and productivity in the industrial sector. Industrial Engineering & Management, 12(2), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.37421/2169-0316.2023.12.191
Ronal, M. (2022). Analisis Produktivitas pada UD. Fika Jaya Kabupaten Tana Toraja. CEMERLANG : Jurnal Manajemen Dan Ekonomi Bisnis, 2(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.55606/cemerlang.v2i2.329
Sakdiyah, S. H., Eltivia, N., & Afandi, A. (2022). Root cause analysis using fishbone diagram: company management decision making. Journal of Applied Business, Taxation and Economics Research, 1(6), 566-576. https://doi.org/10.54408/jabter.v1i6.103
Sumanth, D. J. (1985). Productivity Engineering and Management. McGraw Hill Book Company, Singapore.
Utari, P. M. K., Satriawan, I. K., & Yoga, I. W. G. S. (2019). Analisis produktivitas produksi PT. Karya Pak Oles Tokcer Denpasar. Jurnal Rekayasa dan Manajemen Agroindustri, 7(4), 581-593. https://doi.org/10.24843/JRMA.2019.v07.i04.p10
Waluyo, M. (2008). Produktivitas Untuk Teknik Industri. Dian Samudra.
Published
2025-08-13
How to Cite
Ida Ayu Kade Sintya Yulianti Dewi, I Ketut Satriawan, & Lutfi Suhendra. (2025). Productivity Analysis On Company Xyz Using The Production, Organization, Sales, Product, Arbeiter, Capital (Pospac) Method. International Journal of Economics, Business and Innovation Research, 4(05), 149-166. https://doi.org/10.63922/ijebir.v4i05.2199