The Role of Work Engagement among Older Workers An Industrial Psychology Perspective and Its Contribution to Family Economy

  • Dian Novita Siswanti Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar City, South Sulwesi,Indonesia
  • Muh. Daud Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar City, South Sulwesi,Indonesia
Keywords: work engagement, older workers, industrial psychology, aging workforce, family economy

Abstract

This study examines the role of work engagement among older workers from an industrial psychology perspective and its contribution to family economic stability. Population aging has increased the number of older employees who remain active in the workforce, making their psychological adaptation and productivity increasingly important. Using a library research method, this study systematically reviews scholarly literature from reputable databases to synthesize empirical and theoretical findings related to work engagement, aging workers, and economic outcomes. The findings indicate that work engagement among older workers is generally stable or increases with age due to enhanced emotional regulation, accumulated work experience, and stronger perceptions of work meaning. The Job Demands–Resources model explains that job resources such as autonomy, social support, and flexible work arrangements are critical in sustaining engagement in later adulthood. However, the phenomenon of “mental retirement” suggests that disengagement may emerge prior to formal retirement, particularly in contexts of low job satisfaction. High work engagement is associated with sustained job performance, income continuity, and reduced labor market withdrawal, thereby contributing to household economic resilience. In multigenerational and developing-country contexts, older workers play a crucial role in supporting family economic stability. The study concludes that work engagement serves as a key psychological mechanism linking industrial-organizational outcomes with family economic contributions among older workers.

References

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285.
Bal, P. M., Kooij, D. T. A. M., & De Jong, S. B. (2013). How do developmental and motivational HR practices enhance employee work engagement and commitment? Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.02.001
de Wind, A., Leijten, F. R. M., Hoekstra, T., Geuskens, G. A., van der Beek, A. J., & Burdorf, A. (2017). “Mental retirement?” Trajectories of work engagement preceding retirement among older workers. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 43(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3607
Fisher, G. G., Bulger, C. A., & Smith, C. S. (2009). Beyond work and family: A measure of work/nonwork interference and enhancement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(4), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016737
Mori, K., Odagami, K., Inagaki, M., Moriya, K., Fujiwara, H., & Eguchi, H. (2024). Work engagement among older workers: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational Health, 66(1), 1–15.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
Truxillo, D. M., Cadiz, D. M., & Hammer, L. B. (2012). Supporting the aging workforce: A review and recommendations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111328
United Nations. (2022). World population prospects 2022. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://population.un.org/wpp/
Published
2026-06-02
How to Cite
Dian Novita Siswanti, & Muh. Daud. (2026). The Role of Work Engagement among Older Workers An Industrial Psychology Perspective and Its Contribution to Family Economy. International Journal of Economics, Business and Innovation Research, 5(04), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.63922/ijebir.v5i03.3901