Analysis The Impact Of Vendor Delivery Delays On Distribution Effectiveness And The Formulation Of Procurement Strategies at PT. Ivo Mas Tunggal

MHD. Wahyu Zulkifli; Al Hasin

doi:10.63922/ijebir.v5i03.3953

MHD. Wahyu Zulkifli Department of Management, Department of Management, Faculty of Business and Economics University of Islam Indonesia, Indonesia.
Al Hasin Department of Management, Department of Management, Faculty of Business and Economics University of Islam Indonesia, Indonesia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63922/ijebir.v5i03.3953

Keywords: Delivery Delays, Vendor, Distribution Effectiveness, Procurement Strategy, Procurement

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the impact of delays in goods delivery by vendors on distribution effectiveness and procurement strategy formulation at PT Ivo Mas Tunggal. The background of this study is based on the company’s high demand for the timely availability of goods and services to support operational activities. Internal and external constraints in the procurement process have caused delivery delays, which affect distribution activities and disrupt the company’s overall operational performance. The results of this study indicate that delays in goods delivery by vendors are caused by several factors, including limited stock availability (indent), shipping delays by logistics providers, imported goods procurement processes, regulations on certain restricted goods, and specification mismatches resulting in return processes. These conditions impact delays in fulfilling operational needs and reduce the effectiveness of goods distribution within the company. Therefore, effective communication and coordination with vendors are essential to minimize delivery delays and improve procurement performance.

References

APICS. (2022). SCOR framework overview: Process reference model for supply chain operations (Version 12.0). Supply Chain Council.

Azis, S. A., & Buchdadi, A. D. (2026). Risk management strategies and sustainable financial performance: The moderating role of strategic elements in Indonesian public banks. Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change.

Bastuti, S. (2024). Penerapan FTA dan Analisis Faktor untuk Mengurangi. Jurnal Penelitian dan Aplikasi Sistem dan Teknik Industri (PASTI), 241-252.

Dr. Nursapia Harahap, M. (2020). Penelitian Kualitatif. Medan: Wal ashri Publishing.

Dubey, R., Bryde, D. J., Blome, C., Roubaud, D., & Giannakis, M. (2021). Facilitating artificial intelligence powered supply chain analytics through alliance management during the pandemic crises in the B2B context. Industrial Marketing Management, 135–146.

Fernandes, T. O., Silva, R. M., & Costa, L. P. (2026). Risk management and contingency factors in a public educational institution. Revista Ambiente Contábil.

Guo, X., Lu, G., Villena, V. H., & & Vogel, D. (2022). Supply chain transformation and technology management challenges in developing regions: Inductive theory building from rural Chinese nanostores. Journal of Operations Management.

Heavey, C., & Murphy, E. (2022). Integrating operations and supply chain management concepts for operational excellence. Operations Management Research, 620–636.

Ivanov, D., & A, D. (2020). Viability of intertwined supply networks: Extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. International Journal of Production Research, 2904–2915.

Khan, M. R. (2020). Supply chain performance measurement using SCOR model: A systematic operational approach. Operations & Supply Chain Management, 34-50.

Kieu, M. K. (2026). Exploring trajectories in supply chain integration: A systematic analysis of emerging themes. . Management Review Quarterly.

Pujawan, I. N., & Geraldin, L. H. (2009). House of risk: a model for proactive supply chain risk management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 953-967.

Pujawan, I. N., Karningsih, P. D., & Ristono, A. (2020). Proactive supply chain risk management: A House of Risk perspective in operational systems. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44–58.

Putri, H. J., & Murhayati, S. (2025). Metode Pengumpulan Data Kualitatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 13074-13086.

Romdona, S., Junista, S. S., & Gunawan, A. (2025). Teknik Pengumpulan Data: Observasi,. Jisosepol: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Ekonomi dan Politik.

Safitri, D. P. (2021). Risk mitigation strategy in supply chain using House of Risk framework: Recent development and empirical application. Operations and Supply Chain Management, 275–289.

Shafiqi, K., & Ghayas, M. M. (2025). Understanding the enablers of artificial intelligence adoption for supply chain risk management: A qualitative case study. KASBIT Business Journal.

Sharifi, M. S., & Naimzad, A. (2026). A systematic literature review on supply chain risk management. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities.

Siagian, H., Basana, S. R., Tarigan, Z. J., & & Novitasari, M. (2024). Role of supply chain management in improving competitive advantage of Indonesian small and medium enterprises. Business Perspectives.

Souza, R., Oliveira, P., & Mendes, J. (2022). Applying SCOR model in procurement and logistics integration: Evidence from industrial operations. Sustainability, 3205.

Van Hoek, R. (2020). Research opportunities for a more resilient post-COVID-19 supply chain—Closing the gap between research findings and industry practice. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 341–355.

Yoo, Y., & Park, H. S. (2021). Qualitative risk assessment of cybersecurity and development of vulnerability enhancement plans in consideration of digitalized ship. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 565.