Market Monopoly Through the Lens of Pancasila: Balancing Economic Efficiency and Social Justice

Market Monopoly Through the Lens of Pancasila: Balancing Economic Efficiency and Social Justice

  • Kurnia Ali Syarif, S.H., M.H.Li Bussiness Law Department, Faculty of Social Sciences and Law, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
Keywords: Monopoly, Market, Pancasila, Ekonomi, Social Justice

Abstract

This study examines market monopoly from the perspective of Pancasila, Indonesia’s foundational ideology, emphasizing the balance between economic efficiency and social justice. While monopolistic practices can enhance productivity and resource optimization, they often risk creating inequality, limiting market access, and undermining societal welfare. By integrating the five principles of Pancasila—belief in God, humanitarianism, national unity, democracy through deliberation, and social justice—the study proposes a framework for evaluating and regulating monopolistic behaviors in a way that aligns with ethical, social, and economic values. Using qualitative analysis of policy documents, case studies, and literature, the research highlights how Pancasila-based economic principles advocate for fair competition, equitable wealth distribution, and responsible corporate governance. The findings suggest that applying Pancasila’s moral and social guidelines can mitigate the negative effects of market monopolies while maintaining efficiency, thus fostering sustainable economic development and promoting inclusive prosperity. This perspective offers valuable insights for policymakers, regulators, and scholars seeking culturally grounded approaches to economic governance.

References

Agus, A. A., Khaedir, M., Nurdiyanti, A., & Muntazarah, F. (2024). Pancasila as the basis of scientific ethics builds value awareness in the development of science and technology. Proceedings of the UNM Humanist National Seminar Towards a Golden Indonesia 2045.
Arsyad, L. (2019). Ekonomi Pancasila: Prinsip, Implementasi, dan Tantangan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Basri, M. C., & Siregar, H. (2020). Market concentration and social equity in Indonesian industries. Journal of Southeast Asian Economics, 37(2), 115–134.
Hill, C. W., & Jones, G. R. (2018). Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach (12th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU). (2022). Annual Report on Market Competition and Monopoly Cases in Indonesia. Jakarta: KPPU.
Law No. 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia
Lestari, D. P., & Ningsih, T. (2025). An analysis of the sociology of education on the integration of Islamic values in the modern education system. Pendas: Scientific Journal of Basic Education, 10(4), 309–320.
Mubyarto. (2017). Pancasila Economics and Inclusive Growth. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Nasution, A. (2021). Corporate governance and social responsibility in monopolistic markets. Indonesian Journal of Business Ethics, 5(1), 45–63.
Porter, M. E. (2008). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.
Setiadi, D., & Wibowo, A. (2019). Ethical business practices and Pancasila values: Implications for economic governance. Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences, 11(3), 201–218.
Sutrisman, D., & Sula, I. P. (2024). Pancasila: Contextualization, rationalization, and actualization. Future Science Publisher.
Syarifah, N., et al. (2026). The urgency of Pancasila as the basis for the value of knowledge development. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Sciences, 3(1), 62–73.
World Bank. (2020). Indonesia Economic Update: Promoting Fair Competition and Inclusive Growth. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
Published
2026-06-09
How to Cite
Kurnia Ali Syarif, S.H., M.H.Li. (2026). Market Monopoly Through the Lens of Pancasila: Balancing Economic Efficiency and Social Justice: Market Monopoly Through the Lens of Pancasila: Balancing Economic Efficiency and Social Justice. International Journal of Economics, Business and Innovation Research, 5(04), 548-558. https://doi.org/10.63922/ijebir.v5i04.4174