Mental Workload Analysis of Production Department Employees Using the Nasa TLX Method at PT. X

  • Dio Gilang Ramadhan Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Wastukancana
  • Akhsani Nur Amalia Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Wastukancana
  • Pandena Kicky Basuki Putri Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Wastukancana
Keywords: Mental Workload, Manufacturing Industry, NASA-TLX, Occupational Ergonomics, Production Operator

Abstract

The automotive battery manufacturing industry has work characteristics that require precision, concentration, and speed, thus potentially increasing the mental workload of operators. This study aims to analyze the level of mental workload of operators in the AMB Charging area of ​​PT. X, identify the factors that most influence mental workload, determine the workstation with the highest mental workload, and provide recommendations for improvements. The study used a quantitative method with a descriptive approach. The study population was all 10 AMB Charging area operators and all were sampled based on the Slovin formula calculation. Data collection was carried out through observation, interviews, documentation, and the NASA-TLX questionnaire that measures six dimensions of mental workload. Data analysis was carried out through weighting, rating, Weighted Workload (WWL) calculation, and interpretation of NASA-TLX scores. The results showed that all workstations had mental workload levels in the high to very high category. The Process Dumping, Refilling, Adjustment, and Checker workstations obtained the highest score of 90.20, while the Process Packing obtained the lowest score of 62.00. The most dominant dimensions were Mental Demand, Time Demand, and Effort. This study concludes that mental workload management needs to be prioritized at the highest-scoring workstations through work system improvements, operator training, production target evaluation, and increased automation to reduce human error and improve product quality

References

Dewi, I., Khotimah, H., Nasution, R., Hariyati, T., & Rusli, A. (2025). Population theory and sampling. Journal of Literasiology, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.47783/literasiologi.v9i4
Eni Mahawati, D. (2021). Analysis of workload and work productivity. Kita Menulis Foundation
Hancock, P. A., & Meshkati, N. (1988). Human mental workload. In Advances in Psychology (Vol. 52). Elsevier.
Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Advances in Psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 139–183). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
Tarwaka. (2015). Industrial ergonomics: Basics of ergonomic knowledge and applications in the workplace (Second Edition). Harapan
Published
2026-09-26
How to Cite
Dio Gilang Ramadhan, Akhsani Nur Amalia, & Pandena Kicky Basuki Putri. (2026). Mental Workload Analysis of Production Department Employees Using the Nasa TLX Method at PT. X. International Journal of Economics, Business and Innovation Research, 5(05), 5208-5222. https://doi.org/10.63922/ijebir.v5i05.5502