Analysis Of The Corn Supply  Chain In Pallantikang  Village, Bangkala Subdistrict, Jeneponto

Muh Tri Alqadri; Ratnawati Tahir; Jumiati Jumiati

doi:10.63922/ijebir.v5i05.6092

Muh Tri Alqadri Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Jl. Sultan Alauddin No.259, Gn. Sari, Kec. Rappocini, Kota Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan 90221
Ratnawati Tahir Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Jl. Sultan Alauddin No.259, Gn. Sari, Kec. Rappocini, Kota Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan 90221
Jumiati Jumiati Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Jl. Sultan Alauddin No.259, Gn. Sari, Kec. Rappocini, Kota Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan 90221

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63922/ijebir.v5i05.6092

Keywords: Farmer’s Share, Corn, Marketing Margin, Supply Chain

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the supply chain flow, distribution mechanisms, and marketing margins and farmers’ share for corn in Pallantikang Village, Bangkala Subdistrict, Jeneponto Regency. The research approach is both qualitative and quantitative. The types of data used include primary and secondary data. The sample consisted of 30 farmers, 1 wholesaler, and 2 collectors; the sampling technique for farmers used random sampling, while snowball sampling was used for traders. Data collection was conducted through questionnaires, interviews, observations, and documentation. Data analysis was performed descriptively to describe the supply chain system, product flow distribution, financial flows, information flows, as well as marketing margins and the farmers’ share. The results of the study indicate that the corn supply chain system consists of three supply chain channels, namely: (1) farmers–factory, (2) farmers–collector–factory, and (3) farmers–wholesaler–factory. The distribution process occurs systematically through the involvement of farmers, collector traders, wholesalers, and mills as the main actors; the product flow moves from producers to end consumers; the information flow includes the communication of prices, market demand, and transaction processes among the actors; while the financial flow follows the payment mechanisms in each channel. The marketing margin for Channel I is Rp0/kg, for Channel II is Rp1,500/kg, and for Channel III is Rp1,400/kg. Meanwhile, the farmer’s share is 100%, 74.54%, and 72.72%, respectively. If the farmer’s share is < 50%, marketing is considered inefficient; if it is > 50%, marketing is considered efficient. The research analysis shows that Marketing Channel I is the most efficient channel because it has the highest farmer’s share at 100%. This high value indicates that farmers receive the full sales price without any margin deductions by intermediary institutions.

Keywords: Farmer’s Share, Corn, Marketing Margin, Supply Chain

References

Ardiansyah, A., Natsir, M., & Mudatsir, R. (2024). Analysis of the Marketing Channel for Corn in Pallantikang Village, Bangkala Subdistrict, Jeneponto Regency. Jurnal Agristan, 6(2), 324–333. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37058/agristan.v6i2.11073
Arinong, A. R., & Kadir, E. (2008). Analysis of Cocoa Marketing Channels and Margins in Timbuseng Village, Pattalassang Subdistrict, Gowa Regency. Agrisistem Journal, 4(2), 87–93.
Astuti, L. C. (2023). A Literature Review on the Relationship Between Farmer Characteristics and the Adoption of Innovation in Paddy Rice Cultivation. Agribusiness Paradigm, 5(2), 170–183.
Central Bureau of Statistics. Jeneponto Regency. (2025). Jeneponto in Figures 2025. BPS Jeneponto.
Bobihu, M., Rauf, A., & Boekoesoe, Y. (2022). Analysis of Marketing Channels and Income from Corn Farming in Tomilito Subdistrict, North Gorontalo Regency. AGRINESIA: Scientific Journal of Agribusiness, 6(3), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.37046/agr.v6i3.16141
Djoko, A., & Harsasi, M. G. (2014). Introduction to Supply Chain Management. Ekma, 4371 (Module 1), 1–35.
Gurning, R. N. S., Nurhajijah, Salsabila, Puarada, S. H., & Lubis, W. (2024). Analysis of Marketing Channels and Marketing Efficiency of Corn (Zea mays L.) Farmers in Tanjung Morawa. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 11(1), 129–142.
Heryanto, A. Y., Kristanti, N. E., & Widodo, K. H. (2025). Development of a corn supply chain strategy in East Java based on logistics cost structure and marketing efficiency. Agrointek: Journal of Agricultural Industrial Technology, 19(1), 232–243.
Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2021). A digital supply chain twin for managing disruption risks and resilience in the era of Industry 4.0. Production Planning & Control, 32(9), 775–788
Kumar, P., & Kumar Singh, R. (2022). A strategic framework for developing resilience in agri-food supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 25(11), 1401–1424.
Kusbiantoro, D., & Nasution, K. (2022). Marketing Analysis of Hybrid Corn (Zea mays L.) (Case Study: Deli Tua Village, Namo Rambe Subdistrict, Deli Serdang Regency). Agriland: Journal of Agricultural Science, 10(2), 115–119.
Rahayu, N. F., Hardjomidjojo, H., & Raharja, S. (2021). Value Chain Analysis and Marketing Margins in the Smallholder Fresh Oil Palm Fruit Bunch Supply Chain in Bengkalis Regency. Journal of Agricultural Technology, 22(2), 109–120.
Rahim, S. Y., Rauf, A., & Indriani, R. (2023). The Corn Supply Chain in Boliyohuto Subdistrict, Gorontalo Regency. AGRINESIA: Scientific Journal of Agribusiness, 256–266. https://doi.org/10.37046/agr.v0i0.18647
Sudiyono, A. (2002). Agricultural Marketing. Muhammadiyah University of Malang.
Utami, C. W., Susanto, H., Septina, F., Sumaji, Y. M. P., & Pratama, I. (2019). Effect of supply chain management practices on the financial and economic sustainable performance of Indonesian SMEs. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(5), 523–535.
Wirartha, I. M. (2006). Guidelines for Writing Research Proposals, Undergraduate Theses, and Master’s Theses. Yogyakarta: Andi