Influence Perceived Organizational Support(Pos) Against Employee Engagement To The Employees Of The National Narcotics Agency Of North Sulawesi Province

Maria Rahkita Elvira; Deitje Adolfien Katuuk; Melkian Naharia

doi:10.63922/ijebir.v5i06.6538

Maria Rahkita Elvira Manado State University
Deitje Adolfien Katuuk Manado State University
Melkian Naharia Manado State University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63922/ijebir.v5i06.6538

Keywords: Public Sector Employees, Work Engagement, Employee Engagement, Social Exchange, Perceived Organizational Support

Abstract

Employee engagement is crucial for organizational sustainability, particularly in high-demand and high-risk work environments such as the North Sulawesi BNNP. This study aims to analyze the effect of perceived organizational support (POS) on employee engagement at the North Sulawesi BNNP. The study employed a quantitative approach with an explanatory survey method. The population and sample consisted of 70 employees determined through saturated sampling. Data were collected using a five-point Likert scale questionnaire, with POS measured using the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Engagement using the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, assumption tests, simple linear regression, and t-tests using SPSS 25. The results showed that POS had a positive and significant effect on employee engagement with a coefficient of 0.827, t = 15.225, p < 0.001, and R² = 0.773. In conclusion, increased organizational support is associated with increased employee engagement

References

Aubé, C., Rousseau, V., & Morin, E. M. (2007). Perceived organizational support and organizational commitment: The moderating effect of locus of control. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(5), 479–495.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Eisenberger, R. (2011). Perceived organizational support: Nature, antecedents, and consequences. American Psychological Association.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507.
Katuuk, D. A., Rotty, V. N. J., Lengkong, J. S. J., & Rawung, R. K. S. (2021). Pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dalam pembelajaran online di masa pandemi Covid-19: Tantangan atau peluang? Media Manajemen Pendidikan, 4(1), 160–171.
KemenPAN-RB. (2022). Laporan kinerja aparatur sipil negara. Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2008). Perilaku organisasi (Edisi ke-12). Salemba Empat.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315.
Theovany, C. P., Rivai, H. A., & Lukito, H. (2025). Perceived organizational support dan engagement: Systematic literature review tentang karakteristik penelitian, hubungan, mekanisme mediasi-moderasi, dan outcomes. Journal Publicuho, 9(1).