The Effect Of Employee Empowerment, Work Environment, Work Competency And Work Motivation On Employee Performance At The Ministry Of Religious Affairs (Kemenag) Office In Batam City

  • Edison Edison Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Ibnu Sina
  • Sumardin Sumardin Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Ibnu Sina
  • Suyono Suyono Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Ibnu Sina
Keywords: Employee Empowerment, Work Environment, Competence, Work Motivation, Employee Performance

Abstract

This research was conducted at the Ministry of Religion (Kemenag) Office in Batam City. The number of respondents in this study was 67 respondents. Data collection in this study used a questionnaire. The research was conducted for five months with the analysis tool used being SPSS 19.0. The results of the research can be described as follows; In testing the hypothesis whether the Employee Empowerment variable (X1) in service has an effect on Employee Performance (Y), then Because t count (4,912) > t table (1,675), then Ho is rejected and H1 is accepted, meaning; The regression coefficient is significant or the Employee Empowerment variable has an effect on Employee Performance. In testing the hypothesis whether the Job Responsibility variable (X2) has an effect on Employee Performance (Y), then Because t count (4.326) > t table (1,675), then Ho is rejected and H1 is accepted, meaning; The regression coefficient is significant or the Job Responsibility variable has an effect on the Employee Performance variable. In testing the hypothesis whether the Work Competence variable (X3) has an effect on Employee Performance (Y), then Because t count (7.212) > t table (1.675), then Ho is rejected and H1 is accepted, meaning; The regression coefficient is significant or the Work Competence variable has an effect on the Employee Performance variable. In testing the hypothesis whether the Work Motivation variable (X4) has an effect on Employee Performance (Y), then Because t count (5.726) > t table (1.675), then Ho is rejected and H1 is accepted, meaning; The regression coefficient is significant or the Work Motivation variable has an effect on the Employee Performance variable. In testing the hypothesis whether the Employee Empowerment (X1), Work Responsibility (X2), Work Competence (X3) and Work Motivation (X4) variables simultaneously have an effect on Employee Performance (Y). The Anova test produced a calculated F value of 72.611 > F table 2.80 with a significance level (probability number) of 0.05. If calculated F value > F table, then Ho is rejected and H1 is accepted. Therefore, the regression coefficients of Employee Empowerment (X1), Work Responsibility (X2), Work Competence (X3), and Work Motivation (X4) together have a significant effect on the Employee Performance variable (Y).

References

Almaududi, S., Syukri, M., & Astuti, C. P. (2021). Pengaruh insentif terhadap kinerja karyawan pada Hotel Mexsicana Kota Jambi. J-MAS (Jurnal Manajemen dan Sains), 6(1), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.33087/jmas.v6i1.233
Adamy, M. (2016). Manajemen Sumberdaya Manusia. Unimal Press
Adi Irawan Setiyanto. (2017). Pengaruh Kepuasan Kerja dan Komitmen Organisasi terhadap Turnover Intention. Jurnal Akutansi, Ekonomi dan Manajemen Bisnis. Vol.5, No.1, 105-110
Afandi, P. 2018. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia: Teori, Konsep dan Indikator. Cetakan Kesatu. Nusa Media. Yogyakarta
Arisanti, K. D., Santoso, A., & Wahyuni, S. (2019). Pengaruh motivasi kerja dan disiplin kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan pada PT Pegadaian (Persero) Cabang Nganjuk. JIMEK: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi, 2(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.30737/jimek.v2i1.427.
Armstrong, Michael. (2016). Armstrong’s Handbook of Management and Leadership for HR, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Kogan Page Limited
Ahmad Sani.,2018: Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Anggota Kepolisian Resort Malang. Ulul Albab Vol.5 No.2
Busro, M. 2018. Teori-teori Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Pertama. Cetakan Kesatu. Prenada Media Group. Jakarta
Edy Sutrisno. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Pertama. Jakarta: Kencana
Edison, Anwar, dan Komariyah., 2016., Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Pertama. Alfabeta, Bandung
Hasibuan, Malayu S.P., 2017. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Revisi. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta
Hussein Fattah. 2017. Kepuasan Kerja dan Kinerja Pegawai. Yogyakarta: Elmatera.
Kasmir., 2016., Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Teori dan Praktik). PT Rajagrafindo Persada. Depok
Landra, N., Parwita, G. B. S., & Pebryanti, I. A. M. (2023). Pengaruh pelatihan kerja, disiplin kerja dan self-efficacy terhadap kinerja pegawai pada Dinas Sosial Kabupaten Gianyar. Values, 4(1), 7–18
Lijan Poltak Sinambela., 2018., Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, (Membangun Tim Kerja yang Solid untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja) ,Penerbit Pt Bumi Aksara. Jakarta
Malayu S.P. Hasibuan. (2017). Manajemen: Dasar, Pengertian, dan Masalah. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara
Nengsih Mimi Kurnia dan Meiffa Herfianti. 2023. Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai ASN Dinas Perpustakaan dan Kerasipan Provinsi Bengkulu. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Ekonomi Islam. Vol. 6, No. 1.
Luluk dan Setyaningsih., 2017., Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi dan Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Dengan Motivasi Kerja Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Ekonomi dan Kewirausahaan Vol.7 No.3
Pebryanti Ida Ayu Made, Nengah Lendra dan Gde Bayu Surya Parwita. 2023. Pengaruh Pelatihan Kerja, Disiplin Kerja dan Self-Efficacy terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada Dinas Sosial Kabupaten Gianyar. Vol. 4, No. 1.
Rivai, A. (2020). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Transformasional dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Maneggio: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Manajemen, 3(2), 213–223.
Robbins, Stephen P. and Mary Coulter., 2016. Manajemen, Jilid 1 Edisi 13, Alih Bahasa: Bob Sabran Dan Ratna, Erlangga, Jakarta
Robbin & Judge., 2015., Perilaku Organisasi Edisi 16. Salemba Empat. Jakarta
Simanjuntak, L. 2014. Ekstraksi pigmen antosianin dari kulit buah naga merah (Hylocereus polyrhizus). Jurnal Departemen Teknik Kimia. Fakultas Teknik Universitas Sumatera Utara Medan. Medan
Sedarmayanti. (2017). Tata Kerja Dan Produktivitas Kerja. SP Robbins. (2017). Perilaku organisasi.
Sedarmayanti. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Refika Aditama, Bandung
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif dan R&D. SE
Sumitra Ivoneldi Ade dan Sumiati. 2023. Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada Dinas Pangan Dan Perikanan Kabupaten Dharmasraya. Vol. 2, No. 5.
Sumiati, S., & Sumitra, I. A. (2023). Pengaruh gaya kepemimpinan dan disiplin kerja terhadap kinerja pegawai pada Dinas Pangan dan Perikanan Kabupaten Dharmasraya. Jurnal Economina, 2(5), 1112–1126. https://doi.org/10.55681/economina.v2i5.541
Sutrisno, E. (2018). Manajemen sumber daya manusia (Cetakan ke-10). Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group (Kencana) (Catatan: Penulisan sitasi teks Anda "Sutrisno (2018: 123)"
Virgiyanti, and Bambang Swasto Sunuharyo. 2018. “Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Fisik Dan Non Fisik Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan (Studi Pada Karyawan Divisi Fresh PT. Trans Retail Indonesia (Carrefour) Plaza Tangerang City).” Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB) 61(2): 55–60.
Wahyuniardi, Rizki, Sidik Nurjaman, and Muhamad Rafi Ramadhan. 2018. “Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Dan Kinerja Karyawan.” Jurnal Optimasi Sistem Industri 17(2).
Widodo, Suparno.2015.” Manajemen Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia”.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Yunita, Ade Resta, and Romat Saragih. 2019. “Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Karyawan Perum BulogDivre Jawa Barat.” JUMEA (Jurnal Ilmiah MEA) 3(2): 1–6.
Published
2026-09-15
How to Cite
Edison, E., Sumardin, S., & Suyono, S. (2026). The Effect Of Employee Empowerment, Work Environment, Work Competency And Work Motivation On Employee Performance At The Ministry Of Religious Affairs (Kemenag) Office In Batam City. International Journal of Economics, Business and Innovation Research, 5(05), 4508-4533. https://doi.org/10.63922/ijebir.v5i05.6560