The Influence of Career Development, Job Promotion, Employee Loyalty and Work Environment on Employee Performance at PT. Brigh PLN Batam

Abstract

In testing the hypothesis whether the Career Development variable has an effect on Employee Performance at PT. Brigh PLN Batam, Riau Islands Province, then because the calculated t (7,850) > t table (2.007), then Ho is rejected and H1 is accepted, meaning; The regression coefficient is significant or the Employee Career Development variable has an effect on Employee Performance. In testing the hypothesis whether the Job Promotion variable has an effect on Employee Performance, then Because t count (10.850) > t table (2.007), then Ho is rejected and H1 is accepted, meaning; The regression coefficient is significant or the Job Promotion variable has an effect on Employee Performance. In testing the hypothesis whether the Work Loyalty variable has an effect on Employee Performance, then Because t count (14.290) > t table (2.007), then Ho is rejected and H1 is accepted, meaning; The regression coefficient is significant or the Work Loyalty variable has an effect on Employee Performance. In testing the hypothesis whether the Work Environment variable has an effect on Employee Performance, then Because t count (16.373) > t table (2.007), then Ho is rejected and H1 is accepted, meaning; The regression coefficient is significant or the Work Environment variable has an effect on Employee Performance. In testing the hypothesis whether the variables of Career Development, Job Promotion, Employee Loyalty and Work Environment simultaneously influence Employee Performance. The ANOVA test produces a calculated F number of 120.798 > F table 2.56 with a significance level (probability number) of 0.05. F count > F table then Ho is rejected and H1 is accepted. Then the regression coefficient of Career Development (X1), Job Promotion (X2), Employee Loyalty (X3) and Work Environment (X4) together have a significant effect on the Employee Performance variable (Y).