Students’ Perceptions Of Qris As An Alternative Digital Payment Method In Higher Education

  • Rusli Rusli Management Study Program, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi (STIE) Pemuda, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Syamsul Arifin Management Study Program, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi (STIE) Pemuda, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Abu Darim Management Study Program, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi (STIE) Pemuda, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Nuryadi Nuryadi Management Study Program, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi (STIE) Pemuda, Surabaya, Indonesia
Keywords: studen perception, qris, digital payment, higher education

Abstract

The growth of digital transactions has encouraged the use of QR-based    payment systems, including the Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS). This study aims to examine students’ perceptions of QRIS as a digital payment alternative and identify the obstacles encountered in its use at STIE Pemuda. The study employed a qualitative descriptive approach with nine active students selected through purposive sampling. Data were obtained through open-ended questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, observation, and audio recording, then analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive model. The findings indicate that students generally perceive QRIS positively because it makes payments easier, faster, more practical, efficient, comfortable, and relatively secure. Students also support the potential implementation of QRIS for administrative services, canteens, cooperatives, and student activities on campus. The main obstacles are unstable internet connections, application disruptions, device conditions such as depleted batteries, and the fact that not all merchants accept QRIS. The findings suggest that wider QRIS implementation should be accompanied by adequate digital infrastructure, service reliability, and user education.The growth of digital transactions has encouraged the use of QR-based    payment systems, including the Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS). This study aims to examine students’ perceptions of QRIS as a digital payment alternative and identify the obstacles encountered in its use at STIE Pemuda. The study employed a qualitative descriptive approach with nine active students selected through purposive sampling. Data were obtained through open-ended questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, observation, and audio recording, then analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive model. The findings indicate that students generally perceive QRIS positively because it makes payments easier, faster, more practical, efficient, comfortable, and relatively secure. Students also support the potential implementation of QRIS for administrative services, canteens, cooperatives, and student activities on campus. The main obstacles are unstable internet connections, application disruptions, device conditions such as depleted batteries, and the fact that not all merchants accept QRIS. The findings suggest that wider QRIS implementation should be accompanied by adequate digital infrastructure, service reliability, and user education.The growth of digital transactions has encouraged the use of QR-based    payment systems, including the Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS). This study aims to examine students’ perceptions of QRIS as a digital payment alternative and identify the obstacles encountered in its use at STIE Pemuda. The study employed a qualitative descriptive approach with nine active students selected through purposive sampling. Data were obtained through open-ended questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, observation, and audio recording, then analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive model. The findings indicate that students generally perceive QRIS positively because it makes payments easier, faster, more practical, efficient, comfortable, and relatively secure. Students also support the potential implementation of QRIS for administrative services, canteens, cooperatives, and student activities on campus. The main obstacles are unstable internet connections, application disruptions, device conditions such as depleted batteries, and the fact that not all merchants accept QRIS. The findings suggest that wider QRIS implementation should be accompanied by adequate digital infrastructure, service reliability, and user education.

References

Ajzen, I. (2021). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 151(2), 150–165.
Alamsyah, S., Alfiyansyah, M. A., & Tanjung, H. (2022). Faktor keamanan dan regulasi dalam pembayaran digital. Jurnal Revenue: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 5(1), 972–979.
Andini, K., & Fadilah, R. (2023). Pengaruh informasi dan promosi terhadap penggunaan QRIS. Jurnal Pemasaran Digital, 2(4), 95–105.
Bank Indonesia. (2020). QRIS (Quick Response Code Indonesia Standard). Bank Indonesia.
Bank Indonesia. (2022). Regulasi pembayaran digital di Indonesia: Tinjauan dari perspektif Bank Indonesia. Laporan Sistem Pembayaran Indonesia.
Fadhil, M., & Putri, S. (2022). Pengaruh informasi dan promosi terhadap penggunaan QRIS. Jurnal Infrastruktur Digital, 4(2), 50–60.
Hidayat, A., & Pratama, R. (2021). Persepsi mahasiswa terhadap pembayaran digital. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi, 5(2), 45–58.
Hidayat, M. (2023). Analisis hambatan dalam penggunaan QRIS di wilayah perkotaan dan pedesaan. Jurnal Reksa: Rekayasa Keuangan, Syariah, dan Akuntansi, 8(1), 24–40.
Kurniawan, R., Sri, M., & Pratama, D. (2023). Pengaruh pemahaman mahasiswa terhadap penggunaan QRIS. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 5(2), 110–119.
Laudon, K. C., & Traver, C. G. (2021). E-commerce 2021: Business, technology, society.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.
Putri, D., Susanto, H., & Ramadhan, I. (2022). Pengaruh promosi cashback terhadap minat penggunaan QRIS pada kalangan mahasiswa. Musytari Neraca, 6(1), 102–115.
Rina, D., & Wibowo, T. (2023). Kebijakan kampus yang mendorong penggunaan QRIS dalam transaksi akademik dan non-akademik. Jurnal Kebijakan Pendidikan, 5(1), 30–40.
Suryana, A., & Setiawan, B. (2021). Penggunaan QRIS di kalangan mahasiswa. Jurnal Teknologi dan Bisnis, 3(3), 45–54.
Suryani. (2021). Analisis faktor yang mempengaruhi adopsi QRIS di kalangan generasi milenial. Quranomic: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 2(1), 45–60.
Wijaya, R., Putri, D., & Lestari, M. (2022). Faktor yang mempengaruhi penggunaan QRIS. Jurnal Ekonomi Digital, 4(1), 60–70.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational behavior. Pearson.
Published
2026-10-11
How to Cite
Rusli, R., Syamsul Arifin, Abu Darim, & Nuryadi, N. (2026). Students’ Perceptions Of Qris As An Alternative Digital Payment Method In Higher Education. International Journal of Economics, Business and Innovation Research, 5(06), 904-911. https://doi.org/10.63922/ijebir.v5i06.6795