The Role Of Institutional Quality And CPI In The Relationship Between FDI, Fixed Capital Formation, And Economic Growth In ASEAN

  • Laura Dwipa Saskia -Faculty of Economic and Business, University of Lampung Jl. Prof. Dr. Ir. Sumantri Brojonegoro No. 1, Bandar Lampung 35141
  • Prayudha Ananta Faculty of Economic and Business, University of Lampung Jl. Prof. Dr. Ir. Sumantri Brojonegoro No. 1, Bandar Lampung 35141
  • Heru Wahyudi Faculty of Economic and Business, University of Lampung Jl. Prof. Dr. Ir. Sumantri Brojonegoro No. 1, Bandar Lampung 35141
Keywords: economic growth; corruption perceptions index; FDI; GFCF; institutional quality; ASEAN

Abstract

This study examines the relationship of foreign direct investment (FDI) and gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) with economic growth and tests the corruption perceptions index (CPI) as a moderating variable in seven ASEAN countries over 2012-2024. The study employs a quantitative approach using secondary panel data from the World Bank and Transparency International. Estimation is conducted using the Common Effect Model (CEM) with robust standard errors. The results show that FDI has a negative but statistically insignificant coefficient for economic growth (β = -0.3705; p = 0.134). In contrast, GFCF has a positive coefficient that is significant at the 10% level (β = 0.1954; p = 0.065). The FDI×CPI interaction is positive and statistically significant (β = 0.0201; p = 0.029), indicating that a higher CPI score which reflects a lower perceived level of public-sector corruption is associated with a stronger contribution of FDI to economic growth. Meanwhile, the GFCF×CPI interaction is negative and statistically significant (β = -0.0047; p = 0.002). These findings suggest that the effects of investment depend not only on the volume of capital flows but also on the institutional context and the effectiveness of investment management. The GFCF×CPI interaction should be interpreted cautiously and does not necessarily mean that better governance always reduces the benefits of capital formation.

References

Asante, G. N., Kamasa, K., & Bartlett, M. P. (2022). Foreign direct investment and economic growth nexus in ECOWAS: The leveraging effect of anti-corruption. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol14.iss2.art3

Chen, F., & Jiang, G. (2023). The impact of institutional quality on foreign direct investment: Empirical analysis based on mediating and moderating effects. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2134903

Kharisma, B., Remi, S. S., Wardhana, A., & Silalahi, F. R. (2025). Foreign direct investment, institutional quality and economic growth: Empirical evidence from ASEAN. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan, 26(1), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.23917/jep.v26i1.8822

Li, C., Tanna, S., & Nissah, B. (2023). The effect of institutions on the foreign direct investment-growth nexus: What matters most? The World Economy. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13349

Mardiyani, B. Y., Budiono, B., & Hidayat, A. K. (2023). Local government expenditures, institutional quality and the inclusive economic development index (IEDI) in Indonesia. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.14267/CJSSP.2023.2.6

Transparency International. (2025). Corruption Perceptions Index 2024. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2024

World Bank. (2025). World Development Indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
Published
2026-10-28
How to Cite
Dwipa Saskia, L., Prayudha Ananta, & Heru Wahyudi. (2026). The Role Of Institutional Quality And CPI In The Relationship Between FDI, Fixed Capital Formation, And Economic Growth In ASEAN. International Journal of Economics, Business and Innovation Research, 5(06), 2077-2083. https://doi.org/10.63922/ijebir.v5i06.6960