Development of SCP-SQ-SCS Based Student Worksheets flat building materials for elementary school teacher education students

Hamdana  Hadaming; Muhammad Arif Tiro; Hamzah Upu

doi:10.63922/ijeter.v3i03.2112

Hamdana Hadaming Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
Muhammad Arif Tiro Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
Hamzah Upu Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63922/ijeter.v3i03.2112

Keywords: Development, SCP-SQ-SCS-based Student Worksheet, Critical Thinking

Abstract

This research was conducted with the aim of producing an SCP-SQ-SCS (Stimulation, Concept Understanding, Problem, Search, Question, Solve, Create, and Share) based Student Worksheet in improving mathematical critical thinking skills that meet valid, practical, and effective criteria that can be applied in mathematics lectures for PGSD students. The model development process refers to the development model according to Nieveen, which includes (1) a preliminary stage. This phase involves finding that lecturers need an SCP-SQ-SCS-based Student Worksheet that trains students' critical thinking skills, which contains tasks that can develop students' critical thinking skills. (2) prototyping stage. This phase is designed as an SCP-SQ-SCS-based Student Worksheet, which includes the learning syntax of the SCP-SQ-SCS model. In addition to the validity of WORKSHEETs, the student response questionnaires, student activity observation sheets, and learning implementation observation sheets are also in the very valid category. (3) assessment stage. At this stage, the practicality and effectiveness of the SCP-SQ-SCS-based student worksheet were established. The practicality of the lecturer's response questionnaire analysis results showed a positive response to the Student Worksheet used. The results of the data analysis from the lecturer response questionnaire indicated that the average percentage of lecturer responses, at 92%, fell into the very positive category. The effectiveness of SCP-SQ-SCS-BASED Student Worksheets is seen from the results of data analysis of the components of student activity effectiveness; student response; and learning outcome tests, namely (1) the average percentage of student activities in the implementation of SCP-SQ-SCS-BASED Student WorksheetsIt is at the "good" criteria (2) the average percentage of student responses gives a positive response, and (3) the classical complete learning outcome test.

References

Anwar, Z., Hamid, A., Mahmuri, H., Liani, A. M., & Nurmala, R. (2023, December). Analysis of Mathematical Critical Thinking Skills Through a Semiotic Approach. In 5th International Conference on Statistics, Mathematics, Teaching, and Research 2023 (ICSMTR 2023) (pp. 60-69). Atlantis Press.
Chutami, F., & Suhartini, S. (2021). The Effectiveness of Using Student Worksheets in Science Learning on Student Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(4), 587-592.
Fajriah, N., & Suryaningsih, Y. (2020, February). The development of constructivism-based student worksheets. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1470, No. 1, p. 012011). IOP Publishing.
Hamzah, H. (2022). Innovative learning models in mathematics education. Makassar: UNM Press.
Mardiyana, Saputro, D. R. S., & Rosnawati, R. (2017). The effectiveness of the SSCS learning model, as viewed from the mathematical problem-solving abilities of junior high school students. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 1(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v1i1.5117
Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. In J. van den Akker, R. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design methodology and developmental research in education and training (pp. 125–135). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Nieveen, N., McKenney, S., & Van den Akker, J. (2006). Educational design research. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 151–170). Routledge.
Nurmala, R., Mulbar, U., & Darwis, M. (2025). Panduan desain pembelajaran in action pada pembelajaran matematika di sekolah menengah pertama. CV. Ruang Tentor.
Nurmala, R., Mulbar, U., & Darwis, M. (2025). Pembelajaran In Action : Apakah Efektif Meningkatkan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Siswa?. JURNAL MATH-UMB.EDU 12 (2), 135-141
Sanjaya, P. D., & Hidayat, W. (2018). The development of mathematics learning tools using the SSCS model to improve the problem-solving skills of junior high school students. Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.v12i1.5461
Syahid, N. F., & Mattoliang, L. A. (2024, February). The Effect of Problem-Based Learning Model with Realistic Mathematics Education Approach on Mathematical Communication Skills. In Proceeding of International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research (Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 57-64).
View, A. (2020). Experimental design in education. Makassar: FMIPA UNM.
Word, H. (2023). The creative thinking process of students in solving geometry problems. Journal of Basic Education, 14(2), 123–135.
Word, H., & Manda, D. (2024). Development of mathematical creativity through a problem-solving approach. Journal of Mathematics Education, 10(1), 55–68.
Upu, H., & Nur, A. (2023). Analysis of the use of MFIs in PGSD students in geometry learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 7(3), 98–110
Zulyadaini, D. (2017). A Development of students’ worksheet based on contextual teaching and learning. IOSR Journal of Mathematics, 13(01), 30-38.