Error Analysis of Students in Implementing the Newton-Raphson and Bisection Methods on Nonlinear Equation Root Problems Based on Newman's Error

  • Fadhilah Nur Sa'diyyah - Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
Keywords: Error Analysis, Newman’s Error Analysis, Bisection Method, Newton-Raphson Method.

Abstract

This study aims to describe students' errors in solving nonlinear equation root problems using the Bisection and Newton-Raphson methods based on Newman's Error Analysis (NEA). This study uses a qualitative approach with descriptive methods. The research subjects consisted of 33 students of the Mathematics Education Study Program who had taken the Numerical Analysis course. The research instrument was a Mid-Semester Exam question on the material of nonlinear equation roots covering the Bisection and Newton-Raphson methods. Data collection techniques were carried out through written tests and semi-structured interviews, then analyzed based on Newman's error categories, namely reading, comprehension, transformation, process skills, and encoding. The results showed that the most dominant errors made by students were in the process skills category. In the Bisection method, student errors mostly occurred in the process of evaluating functions and determining new intervals during iteration, while in the Newton-Raphson method, dominant errors occurred in determining function derivatives and substituting iteration values ​​into the Newton-Raphson formula. In addition, it was found that some students experienced transformation errors due to the inability to connect mathematical concepts with algorithmic procedures of numerical methods. Interview results indicate that student errors are influenced by a lack of understanding of basic concepts, low accuracy in numerical operations, and a lack of habit of double checking calculation results. This research is expected to serve as a basis for designing Numerical Analysis learning strategies that emphasize students' conceptual understanding and procedural accuracy.

References

Abdulwahhab, A. M., & Ramadan, A. R. A. (2025). Stability Analysis of Numerical Methods for Solving Nonlinear Equations. Libyan Journal of Medical and Applied Sciences, 3(2), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.64943/ljmas.v3i2.48
Amalina, I. K., & Vidákovich, T. (2023). Cognitive and socioeconomic factors that influence the mathematical problem-solving skills of students. Heliyon, 9(9), e19539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19539
Cuevas, E., Luque, A., & Escobar, H. (2024). Roots of Nonlinear Equations. 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40478-8_7
Doni, P. K. N., & Prabawanto, S. (2025). The Challenges of Junior High School Students in Solving Fraction Problems Based on Newman’s Error Analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 26(2), 1274–1288. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa.v26i2.pp1274-1288
Ghefira, A. M., & Jupri, A. (2025). Newman’s Error Analysis on Junior High School Students’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability in the Pythagorean Theorem. Mathline : Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 913–928. https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v10i4.1033
Hadley, K., & Oyetunji, W. (2022). Extending the theoretical framework of numeracy to engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(2), 376–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20453
Hamayd, H. J., Ali, A. F. A., Khalaf, S. M., & Hameed, M. J. (2025). Analysis and Optimization of Iterative Methods for Solving Nonlinear Equations. International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 38(8s), 178–199. https://doi.org/10.12732/ijam.v38i8s.555
Hidayah, A. U., & Rejeki, S. (2022). Students’ Error Analysis in Solving Word Problems in Exponential Number Topic Based on Newman’s Error Analysis (NEA) Theory. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v11i2.11123
Irianti, N. P., Barr, F. D., Nurasiah, L., & Irsal, N. A. (2024). Error Analysis in Solving Applied Mathematics Problems Based on the Newman Procedure. Inteligensi : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.33366/ilg.v7i1.5883
Sánchez-Peña, M., Vieira, C., & Magana, A. J. (2023). Data science knowledge integration: Affordances of a computational cognitive apprenticeship on student conceptual understanding. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(2), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22580
Siller, H. S., Vorhölter, K., & Just, J. (2025). Problem Posing as a Way of Promoting Individual Mathematical Thinking in STEM Contexts – The Case of Climate Change. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23(6), 2113–2133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10518-7
Sinaga, D., Silalahi, L. G. L., Saing, N. M. T., & Manurung, S. L. (2025). Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika Dalam Memahami Dan Menyelesaikan Soal Induksi Matematika Pada Materi Pengantar Grup Berdasarkan Teori Kastolan. SCIENCE : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 5(1), 350–362. https://doi.org/10.51878/science.v5i1.4658
Published
2026-05-14
How to Cite
-, F. N. S. (2026). Error Analysis of Students in Implementing the Newton-Raphson and Bisection Methods on Nonlinear Equation Root Problems Based on Newman’s Error. International Journal of Technology and Education Research, 4(02), 629-640. https://doi.org/10.63922/ijeter.v4i02.3569