Socio-Economic Characteristics Of The Community Around The Source Of The Madampi Spring, Lawa District Muna Regency

Mariana Zainun; LaPanga Mpalasi; Muhammad Saleh Qadri; Eka Rahmatiah Tuwu; Agus Setiawan; Alamsyah Flamin; L.M. Imanuddin

doi:10.63922/ijeter.v4i03.4655

Mariana Zainun Department of Forestry Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Science, Halu Oleo University, Kendari, Indonesia
LaPanga Mpalasi Department of Agriculture University of Southeast Sulawesi, Kendari, Indonesia
Muhammad Saleh Qadri Department of Environmental Science Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Science, Halu Oleo University, Kendari, Indonesia
Eka Rahmatiah Tuwu Department of Environmental Science Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Science, Halu Oleo University, Kendari, Indonesia
Agus Setiawan Department of Forestry Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Science, Halu Oleo University, Kendari, Indonesia
Alamsyah Flamin Department of Forestry Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Science, Halu Oleo University, Kendari, Indonesia
L.M. Imanuddin Student Department Forestry Kendari College of Agricultural Sciences, Kendari, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63922/ijeter.v4i03.4655

Keywords: Socioeconomic, Characteristics Community, Madampi Spring

Abstract

This study aims to identify the socioeconomic characteristics of the community living around the Madampi spring and to determine the extent to which the community benefits from the existence of this spring. This study employs a descriptive method using simple random sampling to determine the sample size.

Based on an analysis of the socioeconomic characteristics of the community around the Madampi spring—specifically regarding income, education, length of residence, distance from socioeconomic facilities, and land ownership—two characteristics were found to be less significant in terms of the community’s socioeconomic conditions: income and length of residence. The characteristics that significantly influence the community’s socioeconomic conditions are education, distance from socioeconomic facilities (such as markets, banks, health centers, and others), and land ownership. The land ownership characteristic has a particularly significant impact on the community’s socioeconomic conditions. This is evidenced by the community’s use of vacant land to grow cocoa and oranges, which has now begun to transform and improve the community’s economy.

References

Ako, A. A., Shimada, J., Hosono, T., Kagabu, M., Ayuk, A. R., Nkeng, G. E., ... & Fouepe Takounjou, A. L. (2012). Spring water quality and usability in the Mount Cameroon area revealed by hydrogeochemistry. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 34(5), 615-639.
Annells, M., & Koch, T. (2003). Constipation and the preached trio: diet, fluid intake, exercise. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 40(8), 843-852.
Appiah, M., Blay, D., Damnyag, L., Dwomoh, F. K., Pappinen, A., & Luukkanen, O. (2009). Dependence on forest resources and tropical deforestation in Ghana. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 11(3), 471-487.
Arikunto, 1993. CU Sample Extraction Method. Rajawali. Jakarta.
Buurman, J. (2004). Rural Land Markets; a spatial explanatory model. Tijdschrift Voor Sociaalwetenschappelijk Onderzoek Van De Landbouw, 19(1), 64-65.
Casa, D. J., Clarkson, P. M., & Roberts, W. O. (2005). American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on hydration and physical activity: consensus statements. Current sports medicine reports, 4(3), 115-127.
Dolidon, N., Hofer, T., Jansky, L., & Sidle, R. (2009). Watershed and forest management for landslide risk reduction. In Landslides–disaster risk reduction (pp. 633-649). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Hemetsberger, R., Posa, A., Farhan, S., Hemetsberger, H., Redwan, B., Pavo, N., ... & Gyöngyösi, M. (2011). Drug-Eluting introducer sheath prevents local peripheral complications: Pre-Clinical evaluation of nitric Oxide–Coated sheath. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 4(1), 98-106.
Jorgensen, B., Graymore, M., & O'Toole, K. (2009). Household water use behavior: An integrated model. Journal of environmental management, 91(1), 227-236.
Lécuyer, C. (2013). Water on Earth: Physicochemical and biological properties. John Wiley & Sons.
Moss, B. (2010). Ecology of fresh waters: a view for the twenty-first century. John Wiley & Sons.
Omer, A. M. (2008). Energy, environment and sustainable development. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 12(9), 2265-2300.
Panczak, R., Galobardes, B., Voorpostel, M., Spoerri, A., Zwahlen, M., Egger, M., & Swiss National Cohort and the Swiss Household Panel. (2012). A Swiss neighbourhood index of socioeconomic position: development and association with mortality. Journal of epidemiology and community health, 66(12), 1129-1136.
Popkin, B. M., D'Anci, K. E., & Rosenberg, I. H. (2010). Water, hydration, and health. Nutrition reviews, 68(8), 439-458.
Subramani, T., Elango, L., & Damodarasamy, S. R. (2005). Groundwater quality and its suitability for drinking and agricultural use in Chithar River Basin, Tamil Nadu, India. Environmental Geology, 47(8), 1099-1110.
Tang, Q., Bennett, S. J., Xu, Y., & Li, Y. (2013). Agricultural practices and sustainable livelihoods: Rural transformation within the Loess Plateau, China. Applied Geography, 41, 15-23.
Wang, J., & Gunderson, M. (2012). Minimum wage effects on employment and wages: dif‐in‐dif estimates from eastern China. International Journal of Manpower, 33(8), 860-876.
WHO/UNICEF Joint Water Supply, & Sanitation Monitoring Programme. (2005). Water for life: Making it happen. World health organization.