Representation Of Toxic Positivity In Clash Of Champions Shows  On The Ruangguru Youtube Channel (Case Study at SMA Negeri 1 Tumijajar)

Armita Sahrul; Wawan Hernawan; M. Denu Poyo

doi:10.63922/ijevss.v4i03.2204

Armita Sahrul University of Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
Wawan Hernawan University of Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
M. Denu Poyo University of Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63922/ijevss.v4i03.2204

Keywords: Representation, toxic positivity , Clash of Champions, Ruangguru Youtube Channel.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the representation of toxic positivity in the Clash of Champions broadcast on the Ruangguru YouTube Channel (Case Study at SMA Negeri 1 Tumijajar). The research method used was qualitative with a descriptive approach. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation with students at SMA Negeri 1 Tumijajar. The data were analyzed using qualitative descriptive analysis. The results show a representation of toxic positivity. According to students of SMA Negeri 1 Tumijajar, the message that appears in the Clash of Champions broadcast on the Ruangguru YouTube channel is manifested through a narrative that emphasizes the importance of always thinking positively, not giving up, and continuing to fight without a balanced depiction of emotional realities such as sadness, failure, or fatigue. The broadcast tends to simplify the process of achieving success, as if it only requires passion and motivation, without considering social, psychological, or economic obstacles. The meaning contained behind the narrative and visuals of the broadcast Clash of Champions represents toxic positivity in the form of pressure to always appear strong, cheerful, and never give up under any circumstances. According to some students, these messages can be uplifting, but can also be burdensome when under pressure, because they feel they are not allowed to show vulnerability or failure. The consistent visuals of success and happiness reinforce the construct that negative emotions are a form of weakness that must be avoided. The responses of students at SMA Negeri 1 Tumijajar to the representation of toxic positivity in the Clash of Champions show varied. Some students accepted the motivational messages as constructive (dominant-hegemonic), others interpreted them critically (negotiated), and still others felt the messages actually created emotional pressure (oppositional)

References

REFERENCES

Amalia, R., & Nurhalimah, D. (2022).”Emotional Cultivation in Educational Shows.”Journal of Adolescent Psychology , 4(1), 22–31.

Danesi. (2018). Introduction to Understanding Media Semiotics. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra Publisher.

Edy. (2017). Youtube, the Image of Interactive Information Media or Media for Conveying Personal Aspirations. Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts. Vol. 1 (2) , 406-417.

Fadilah, S. (2023).”Toxic Positivity in Digital Educational Broadcasts: An Agenda Setting Study.”Journal of Digital Communication Science , 7(3), 55–70.

Fikri. (2024). Representation of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder in the Film 27 Steps of May: Implications for Preventive Counseling. Journal of Islamic Guidance and Counseling, KH Abdurrahman Wahid State Islamic University, Pekalongan , 7.

Fiske. (2018). Introduction to Communication Science, Third Edition. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Fitri et al. (2020). Sentiment Analysis of the Ruangguru Application Using the Naive Bayes, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine Algorithms. Transformatika Journal, 18 (1) , 71–80.

Geaby and Hendro. (2021). Toxic positivity : The Other Side of the Concept of Always Being Positive in All Conditions. Psychopreneur Journal. Vol. 6, No. 1. , 11.

Hidayat, A., & Wulandari, T. (2022). Media, Agenda Setting and Digital Literacy. Surabaya: UB Press.

Jati et al. (2021). Generation Z's Understanding of the Influence of Toxic Positivity on Individual Social Relationships. Journal of the Guidance and Counseling Study Program, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia , 1.

Moleong. (2017). Qualitative Research Methods. Bandung: PT Remaja. Rosdakarya.

Mulyana. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology, Revised Edition. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyana D. (2016). Communication Science: An Introduction. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nugroho, F., & Arimbi, R. (2022). Media Semiotic Analysis: Discourse, Symbols, and Ideology. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Pratama. (2018). Representation of Islamic Values in Journalistic Photos (Charles Sanders Peirce's Semiotic Analysis of Journalistic Photos in the Riau Pos Daily Newspaper, Ramadhan Edition 1438 H). Doctoral dissertation, Riau Islamic University , 25-26.

Putri, I., & Mardatillah, M. (2022).”The Phenomenon of Toxic Positivity in Social Media: A Social Psychology Analysis.”Journal of Communication and Media , 9(2), 134–147.

Rachman. (2018). Representation in Film. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Rahadian, Rahayu and Oktavia. (2019). Educational Technology: A Study of the Ruangguru Application Based on the Principles and Paradigms of Human-Computer Interaction. PETIK Journal Volume 5, Number 1, March 11.

Rahman, T., and Sari, M. (2021). The impact of excessive motivation on digital platforms on students' mental health. Journal of Digital Education , 5(3), 45-60.

Rahmawati, S. (2021).”The Myth of Success in YouTube Motivational Shows: A Barthes Semiotic Analysis.”Visual Media Journal , 5(1), 88–102.

Ruangguru. (2024). Clash of Champions YouTube Series. Retrieved from https://www.ruangguru.com .

Samha et al. (2022). Toxic positivity in Generation Z. Proceedings Conference on Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Vol 1 No 1 December , 90-94.

Satriopamungkas et al. (2020). Designing a Short Film on Toxic Positivity in the Surabaya Community. Jurnal DKV 1:1 , 25-26.

Setiawan, D., & Hapsari, P. (2020).”A Study of Reception of Inspirational Shows Among Teenagers.”Journal of Interactive Communication , 8(2), 111–124.

Simanjuntak, H., & Marpaung, E. (2023). Representation of Identity in Digital Media: A Visual Culture Approach. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Siregar, R. (2021). Social Construction in Educational Media. Bandung: Alfabeta.

SMA Negeri 1 Tumijajar. (2024). Report on Student Participation in Digital Competitions. Lampung: SMA Negeri 1 Tumijajar.

Smith, J., and Johnson, A. (2022). Toxic positivity in educational competitions: Impact on mental health. Psychology Today.

Soekanto and Sulistyowati. (2017). Sociology: An Introduction. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Sutrisno, D., and Purnamasari, F. (2019). The influence of academic pressure and excessive motivation on students' mental health in the school environment. Journal of Education and Psychology , 11(3), 67-79.

Sugiyono. (2018). Quantitative, Qualitative and R and D Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Taufik, MA, and Wijayanti, N. (2020). Toxic positivity in the context of digital education: Challenges for students' psychological well-being. Indonesian Journal of Psychology , 8(1), 102-115.

Upadhyay et al. (2022). Toward Toxic Positivity Detection. Hyderabad: International Institute of Information Technology , 145-146.

Widiyanti, R., & Mulyadi, A. (2023). Media and Adolescent Mental Health: A Cultivation Theory Study. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Wiryany. (2019). The Power of New Media YouTube in Shaping Popular Culture. ArtComm: Journal of Communication and Design , 46-47.

Zainal, Karomani, Neta and Kagungan. (2021). The communication activities and women's roles in rudat culture based on customary law. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24 (7) , 1-12.