Sociopragmatic Analysis Of Presuppositions In Jerome Polin's Youtube Content
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the forms and types of presuppositions in Jerome Polin's YouTube video content using sociopragmatic studies. Language not only functions as a means of communication, but also reflects social reality and relationships between individuals. In this context, presupposition is seen as a pragmatic aspect that contains implicit meanings based on shared assumptions between speakers and interlocutors. The method used is descriptive qualitative with data collection techniques in the form of listening, note-taking, and bibliography. The data were taken from a video entitled "Shock.. This Girl Graduated from High School at 14, Already a Doctorate at 20! Memorized 1000 Numbers of Pi!? Jerome Speechless". The results show that in the video there are four types of presuppositions, namely existential with 2 data, lexical with 1 data, structural with 13 data, and factive with 3 data. Meanwhile, nonfactive and counterfactual presuppositions were not found. This finding indicates that presuppositions in YouTube content not only clarify messages, but also build social closeness, and demonstrate the function of language in the context of digital communication. This research shows that sociopragmatic studies have important relevance in analyzing utterances in social media such as YouTube as a form of modern discourse
References
Fatmahwati, A. (2021). A Sociopragmatic Study of Islamic Propagation Advertisements About Usury. Ranah: Jurnal Harian Bahasa. 10(2). 293-303.
Husaini Usman and Purnomo Setiadi Akbar. (2009). Social Research Methodology. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Karim, Tadjuddin Makmum, A. A. (2019). Presuppositions in Environmental Conservation Socialization Pamphlets in Wakatobi Regency. Journal of Cultural Studies. (7). 241–247.
Kridalaksana, Harimurti. (2008). Linguistic Dictionary, Fourth Edition. Jakarta: Gamedia Pustaka Utama.
Leech, G. (1993). Principles of Pragmatics. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
Levinson, Stephen C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mahsun. (2014). Language Research Methods: Stages, Strategies, Methods, and Techniques. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Mardalis. (1999). Research Methodology. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Megawati, M., Ana, H., & M. Yazid. (2019). The Use of Dexis in Buginese Folktales Translated into Indonesian. Journal of Language Education. 8(2).
Nababan, P.W.J. (1987). Pragmatics: Theory and Its Application. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture.
Rahardi, K. (2009). Sociopragmatics. Jakarta: Erlangga University.
Rustono. (1999). Principles of Pragmatics. Semarang: CV. IKIP Semarang Press.
Sudaryanto. (2015). Methods and Various Techniques of Language Analysis. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.
Sugiyono. (2021). Qualitative Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta Publishers.
Sutopo, H.B. (2002). Qualitative Research Methods: Theoretical Basis and Application in Research. Surakarta: Sebelas Maret University.
Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Tologana, W. (2016). Deixis in Asma Nadia's Novel "Assalamualaikum Beijing." Thesis. Manado: Sam Ratulangi University.
Winaryadi, D. R., Parnaningroem, R, R, D, W. (2020). Presupposition in the Short Story "Die Reise Zum Mittelpunkt Der Erde" by Jules Verne. UNESA Online Journal.
Yule, George. (2006). Pragmatics (translated edition by Indah Fajar Wahyuni and Rombe Mustajab). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

















Contact Person +6282139474255
Email : ijevss@citakonsultindo.or.id / editor.ijevss@gmail.com