Analysis of Answer Processes Based on Mathematical Creative Thinking Abilities in Contextual Teaching and Learning

  • Lois Oinike Tambunan Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar, Indonesia
  • Sahat Saragih Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
  • Elvis Napitupulu Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
Keywords: : Answering Process; Contextual Teaching and Learning; Creative Thinking.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and determine: (1) the level of students' mathematical creative thinking ability when taught using the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) model; (2) a description of the students' creative thinking process in mathematics during the learning process using the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) model. This research is a descriptive qualitative study. The subjects of this research were 30 students of class VIII-2 from SMP Negeri 1 Pematangsiantar. The research findings are as follows: (1) 18 students in the high-ability category were classified as highly creative, fulfilling 3 indicators of creative thinking: fluency, flexibility, and novelty; 9 students in the moderate-ability category were classified as creative, fulfilling 2 indicators of creative thinking: fluency and flexibility; and 3 students in the low-ability category were classified as less creative, fulfilling only 1 indicator of creative thinking: fluency. These results indicate that students demonstrated an improvement in creative thinking abilities after being taught using the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) model. It is also hoped that the Contextual Teaching and Learning model can be applied in the learning process to enhance students' mathematical creative thinking abilities.: Answering Process; Contextual Teaching and Learning; Creative Thinking.

References

A, M. (2014). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Kajian Teoritis dan Praktis. Interes Media.
Agung, L. dan N. . (2012). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Ombak.
Dariman, K. (2019). Students’ Creative Thinking With 4’R Applications in Procedure Text Project Based Learning. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i1.1375
Fajartriani, A. B. S. (2020). POTENSIA: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, Vol. 6, No. 2, Juli – Desember 2020 | 185. 6(2), 185–204.
Fayesa, I., Ayu garawati, R., & Hamidah, I. (2023). Systematic Literature Review: Pengaruh Motivasi Dan Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa. AB-JME: Al-Bahjah Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(2), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.61553/abjme.v1i2.53
Handoko, H., Rochmad, & Isnarto. (2022). Nilai-nilai matematika dalam perspektif filsafat humanisme sebagai pembentuk kepribadian. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar …, 5, 140–144. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/54351%0Ahttps://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/download/54351/21150
Hanifah, N. N., Sari, C. K., Kholid, M. N., & Faiziyah, N. (2024). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Segitiga dan Segiempat. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 827–840. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v8i1.2532
Hanipah1), N., Yuliani2), A., & Rippi Maya3). (2018). 3 1,2,3. 7(2).
Lisnani, L., Zulkardi, Z., Putri, R. I. I., & Somakim, S. (2020). Etnomatematika: Pengenalan Bangun Datar Melalui Konteks Museum Negeri Sumatera Selatan Balaputera Dewa. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(3), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v9i3.754
Maryati, I. (2021). PYTHAGORAS : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika , 16 ( 2 ), 2021 , 253-265 Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa sekolah menengah atas dalam materi aljabar. 16(2), 253–265.
Moma, L. (2015). Pengambangan Instrumen Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Untuk Siswa SMP. 2017, 4(April), 27–41.
Mulyatiningsih, E. (2012). Metode Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pendidikan.
Palennari, M., Rachmawaty, R., Saparuddin, S., Saleh, A. R., & Jamaluddin, A. Bin. (2023). Pelatihan Pembelajaran Inovatif Abad 21 Bagi Guru SMP Negeri 2 Galesong Utara. Jurnal IPMAS, 3(2), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.54065/ipmas.3.2.2023.272
Pratama, N. Y. P., Isa, S. F. P., & Yunita, S. (2022). Analisis Penyebab Rendahnya Relevansi Pendidikan dengan Tuntutan Masyarakat. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan, 06(02), 9752–9759. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/3937/3303
Putri, hafiziani eka, Muqodas, I., Wahyudy, mukhamad ady, A., A., Sasqia, ayu shandra, & A., & Nur, luthfi aulia. (2020). KemampuanKemampuan Matematis dan Pengembangan Instrumennya.
Retnowati, P., & Ekayanti, A. (2020). Think Talk Write Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa. Sigma, 6(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.36513/sigma.v6i2.863
Richardo, R., Mardiyana, & Saputro, D. R. S. (2014). Tingkat Kreativitas Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Divergen Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Siswa (Studi Pada Siswa Kelas IX MTS Negeri Plupuh Kabupaten Sragen Semester Gasal Tahun Pelajaran 2013/ 2014). Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(2), 141–151. https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/s2math/article/view/3912/0
Riduwan. (2015). Skala Pengukuran Variabel Penelitian. Alfabeta.
Rusman. (2018). Model-model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Rajawali Press.
Saputra, M. D., Joyoatmojo, S., Wardani, D. K., & Sangka, K. B. (2019). Developing critical-thinking skills through the collaboration of Jigsaw model with problem-based learning model. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1077–1094. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12169a
Siswono, T. (2008). Model Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Pengajuan dan Pemecahan Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif. Surabaya.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. Alfabeta.
Turmudi. (2018). Landasan Filsafat dan Teori Pembelajaran Matematika Berparadigma Eksploratif dan Investigatif. Leuser citra Pustaka.
Utami, R. W., Endaryono, B. T., & Djuhartono, T. (2020). Meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa melalui pendekatan open-ended. Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 43–48.
Zahorik, J. (1997). The Effects of Planning on Teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 71, 143–151.
Published
2025-09-17
How to Cite
Lois Oinike Tambunan, Sahat Saragih, & Elvis Napitupulu. (2025). Analysis of Answer Processes Based on Mathematical Creative Thinking Abilities in Contextual Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Education, Vocational and Social Science , 4(04), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.63922/ijevss.v4i04.2289