Policy Study on Basic Indonesian Language Education for Foreign Speakers in Indonesian Universities from the Perspective of Language Education Planning: A Case Study of Chinese Students at Yogyakarta State University

  • Wei Xiong Rui Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
  • Ari Kusmiatun Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
Keywords: LPP, BIPA, UNY

Abstract

This article discusses the implementation of the Basic Indonesian Language for Foreigners (Bahasa Indonesia untuk Penutur Asing, or BIPA) policy in Indonesian higher education institutions from the perspective of language education planning and its significance. In recent years, the Indonesian government has gradually implemented BIPA programs to enhance the international influence of the Indonesian language. On the other hand, as academic and cultural exchanges between China and Indonesia continue to grow, an increasing number of Chinese students are pursuing their studies in Indonesia, making language adaptation challenges increasingly prominent. In this context, research on how BIPA policies help Chinese students overcome linguistic barriers and adapt to the learning environment in Indonesian universities holds considerable importance. The study focuses on the basic Indonesian language courses offered by Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta (UNY) for Chinese students. Methodologically, this article employs a combination of literature analysis, policy text interpretation, and questionnaire-based surveys: on one hand, it examines relevant academic research and policy documents to establish a theoretical foundation; on the other, it analyzes BIPA policy texts at both the national government and UNY levels, while also collecting feedback from Chinese students through questionnaires and interpreting the survey data through the lens of Language Policy and Planning (LPP) theory. The article concludes that higher education institutions should formulate curriculum policies, teaching methodologies, and instructional content in alignment with the requirements stipulated in national policy, while also integrating these elements with the university’s broader human resource development objectives. Furthermore, universities should encourage both instructors and students to actively participate in the development and refinement of language education policies. Specifically, curriculum policy should emphasize systematic course design and provide diverse course options tailored to students with varying levels of Indonesian proficiency; teaching methodology policy should guide instructors toward approaches that foster independent learning and holistic student development; and instructional content policy should offer clear guidance for selecting materials that are authentic, comprehensive, professionally relevant, and aligned with students’ academic competencies and career aspirations.

References

Kaplan, R. B. (2017). “Language planning in perspective”. Current Issues in Language Planning, 18(2), 129-148.
Cobarrubias, J., & Fishman, J. A. (Eds.). (1997). Progress in Language Planning: International Perspectives. Mouton de Gruyter.
Kaplan, R. B., & Baldauf, R. B. Jr. (2003). Language Planning from Practice to Theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Shohamy, E. (2006). Language Policy: Hidden Agendas and New Approaches. Routledge.
Hornberger, N. H. (2006). Frameworks and models in language policy and planning. In B. Spolsky (Ed.), An Introduction to Language Policy (pp. 24–41). Blackwell.
Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang No. 24 Tahun 2009 tentang Bendera, Bahasa, dan Lambang Negara serta Lagu Kebangsaan.
Badan Bahasa. (2023). Standar Program BIPA & Kurikulum Nasional BIPA 2023. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Badan Bahasa. (2024). Panduan Resmi UKBI Adaptif Merdeka bagi Peserta. Jakarta: Badan Bahasa.
Widiyanti, S. et al. (2024). “Innovative Solution for BIPA: Enhancing Reading Skills and Cultural Awareness at UNY”. Jurnal Pendidikan (UNESA), 8(2), 45-59.
Touheed A., Aman. (2024). “Impact of the BIPA Course on International Student Cultural Adaptation in Indonesian Universities”. Journal of Language and Culture Studies, 6(1), 22-35.
Febrianto, A. I. (2023). “Evaluation of BIPA at UNY Using CIPP Model”. ICLLE 2023 Proceedings, 97-106.
Melati, N., & Pratiwi, R. (2023). “How Students’ Entry-Level Competencies Determine BIPA Needs”. BASA Journal, 5(3), 1-15.
Lu, Y. (2021). BIPA Teaching Strategies for Chinese Learners: A Case Study at UNY (Master’s thesis). UNY.
Widodo, H. P. (2022). “Task-Based Learning in BIPA Classrooms: A Mixed-Methods Study”. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(3), 623-639.
Suryani, I. (2022). “Teaching Material Needs of Chinese BIPA Students at Advanced Level”. Journal of Language & Literature Studies, 14(1), 30-45.
Pusat Pengembangan BIPA UNY. (2023). Buku Pedoman Program BIPA UNY 2023/2024.
Setiawan, B. (2023). “Implementing UKBI Adaptive for BIPA Students: Reliability and Validity”. Bahasa & Sastra, 10(2), 55-70.
Gunawan, A. (2022). “Applying CIPP Model to Evaluate BIPA Programs”. Proceedings of ICLS, 2, 88-95.
Khoiriyah, L. (2023). “Cultural Shock and Adaptation among Chinese Students in Yogyakarta”. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 44(4), 521-539.
Yan, Y. (2023). Cultural adaptation of Chinese students in Indonesia: A qualitative study. International Journal of Communication & Society, 5(2), 24–30.
Idrus, H. (2024). Internationalization of Indonesian higher education institutions through BIPA. Higher Education Quarterly, 78(1), 112–129.
Mwakapemba, J. L., et al. (2024). Evaluation of the implementation of BIPA at UNY. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 28(2): 186-194 – UNY BIPA program’s curriculum aligns with national standards; challenges include limited materials & lack of formal tests.
EARES Conference (2023). How is the BIPA Program Evaluated? – Report on UNY BIPA: materials from Badan Bahasa (2015/2016) align with CEFR; includes local culture content; final exam and mini research project in Indonesian; need for academic vocabulary and formal assessment.
Published
2025-11-18
How to Cite
Wei Xiong Rui, & Ari Kusmiatun. (2025). Policy Study on Basic Indonesian Language Education for Foreign Speakers in Indonesian Universities from the Perspective of Language Education Planning: A Case Study of Chinese Students at Yogyakarta State University. International Journal of Education, Vocational and Social Science , 4(04), 949-963. https://doi.org/10.63922/ijevss.v4i04.2527