The AI-Dependent Learning Phenomenon Exploring Students’ Dependence on AI in Completing College Academic Task

Khaerun Nisa SH; Sahade; Lailatul Maziyah Wildan Mufaridho

doi:10.63922/ijevss.v5i01.2645

Khaerun Nisa SH State University of Makassar, Indonesia
Sahade State University of Makassar, Indonesia
Lailatul Maziyah Wildan Mufaridho Darunnajah University, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63922/ijevss.v5i01.2645

Keywords: AI-Dependent Learning, Students’ Dependence, Academic Task

Abstract

This study investigates the emerging phenomenon of AI-dependent learning among university students, focusing on how reliance on generative artificial intelligence tools shapes their academic behaviors, learning motivation, and engagement with course tasks. The rapid advancement of AI applications, such as ChatGPT, has transformed students’ study habits, yet concerns arise regarding excessive reliance that may weaken independent cognitive processes. Using a qualitative descriptive method, this research involved 30 accounting students from State University of Makassar. Participants were selected through purposive sampling to ensure they had substantial exposure to AI-assisted academic work. The findings indicate that AI dependence is commonly driven by academic workload, tight deadlines, a desire for efficiency, and the perception that AI provides faster and higher-quality output. However, overreliance leads to diminished critical thinking, reduced confidence in completing tasks independently, and concerns related to academic integrity. This study highlights the urgent need for universities to establish AI literacy guidelines, promote responsible use, and design learning activities that balance technological assistance with genuine cognitive engagement.

References

Aristovnik, A., Ravšelj, D., & Umek, L. (2022). Digital competence of higher education students: Impact on academic performance. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1).
Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). The influence of generative AI on student academic behavior. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(1), 45–62.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2024). Student motivations for using AI in academic work. Journal of Educational Technology Research, 12(2), 110–128.
Dawson, P. (2023). Defending academic integrity in the age of AI text generators. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21(4), 725–742.
8
IJEVSS, Volume 04 Issue 02, 2025

Dwivedi, Y. K., et al. (2023). The new age of artificial intelligence in education: Benefits, risks, and challenges. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.
Fischer, F., & Stuber, S. (2023). Cognitive offloading to AI systems: Risks and benefits for learners. Educational Psychology Review, 35, 1–20.
Hwang, G. J., & Chen, C. Y. (2023). Research trends in artificial intelligence–supported learning. Computers & Education, 194, 104678.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2023). AI in Education: Guidance for Responsible Use. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Holmes, W., Butterworth, J., & Higginson, A. D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Promises and perils. Computers & Education: AI, 4.
Jiang, L., & Xu, Y. (2024). Exploring university students’ reliance on AI tools: A qualitative perspective. Journal of Education and Learning, 13(2), 66–78.
Kasneci, E., Sesagiri Raamkumar, A., & Sessler, K. (2023). Students’ perceptions of ChatGPT in academic writing. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100123.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models in education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103.
Khan, H., Alharbi, O., & Watson, S. (2024). Evaluating the reliability of AI detectors in academic settings. International Journal of Educational Integrity, 20(1), 14–29.
Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2024). Academic integrity in the age of AI: Risks and policy directions. Higher Education Review, 18(1).
Lai, M. Y., Chen, Y., & Faulkner, M. (2024). AI literacy and student engagement in higher education. Educational Technology & Society, 27(1), 55–68.
Liang, H., Zhu, Y., & Park, J. (2024). The accuracy and fairness of AI-written text detectors: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 152.
Lodge, J., & Corrin, L. (2022). Learner agency in digital learning environments. Journal of Learning Analytics, 9(2).
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications.
Mutlu-Bayraktar, D., & Yildiz, E. (2023). AI literacy in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13.
Panisoara, I., Lazar, I., & Panisoara, G. (2020). Digital dependence in higher education: Implications for motivation and academic performance. Sustainability, 12(17).
Popenici, S., & Kerr, S. (2024). AI, critical thinking, and academic authenticity. Journal of Higher Education Policy, 18(1), 1–19.
9
IJEVSS, Volume 04 Issue 02, 2025

Pratama, G. S., & Firmansyah, D. (2023). AI readiness among university students in Indonesia. Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3).
Reynolds, E., & McDonell, N. (2023). Student use of AI text generators: Patterns, motivations, and concerns. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1423–1440.
Santos, F., & Miller, T. (2024). Cognitive consequences of AI overreliance among university students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 140(2).
Schindler, L. A., Silva, D., & Pereira, C. (2024). Consequences of AI reliance for academic writing skills. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(2), 250–268.
UNESCO. (2023). Guidelines for the Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
Zhai, X. (2023). Generative AI in education: Impacts and implications. Computers and Education, 191.