Narrating Unity and Power

Economic Discourse as Ideological Text in President Prabowo’s D-8 Summit Speech

Keywords: Political Discourse, Ideology, Global South, Literary CDA, Economic Narrative

Abstract

Political speeches delivered in international forums may be read not only as policy statements but also as ideological texts that construct collective identity and narrate power relations. This article examines President Prabowo Subianto’s speech at the D-8 Summit as a literary-discursive artifact that articulates economic unity as a central ideological narrative of the Global South. Drawing on Norman Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis, the study adopts a qualitative textual approach to analyze lexical patterns, repetition, modality, and evaluative language. The findings indicate that the speech employs economic statistics, historical allusions, and moral appeals to produce a narrative in which unity signifies strength, fragmentation signifies vulnerability, and cooperation becomes a moral and political obligation. References to justice, inclusivity, and solidarity with Palestine further position the D-8 within a shared postcolonial consciousness. The study argues that the speech functions as a narrative of resistance that reimagines economic cooperation as cultural and ideological power. By treating political discourse as a literary text, this article contributes to literary studies by demonstrating how language, ideology, and power intersect in contemporary global narratives.

References

Fairclough, N. (1992). *Discourse and social change*. Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995). *Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language*. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2003). *Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research*. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2010). *Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language* (2nd ed.). Routledge.
van Dijk, T. A. (1998). *Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach*. SAGE Publications.
van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. *Journal of Political Ideologies*, 11(2), 115-140.
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). *Discourse and power*. Palgrave Macmillan.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2009). *Methods of critical discourse analysis* (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). *Metaphors we live by*. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (2004). *Don't think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate*. Chelsea Green Publishing.
van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. *Discourse & Communication*, 1(1), 91-112.
van Leeuwen, T. (2008). *Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis*. Oxford University Press.
Chilton, P. (2004). *Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice*. Routledge.
Blommaert, J. (2005). *Discourse: A critical introduction*. Cambridge University Press.
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). *Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism*. Routledge.
Hart, C. (2010). *Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse*. Palgrave Macmillan.
Anwar, D. F. (2010). The impact of domestic and Asian regional changes on Indonesian foreign policy. *Southeast Asian Affairs*, 2010(1), 126-141.
Sukma, R. (2011). Soft power and public diplomacy: The case of Indonesia. In S. J. Lee & J. Melissen (Eds.), *Public diplomacy and soft power in East Asia* (pp. 91-115). Palgrave Macmillan.
Weinstock, J. I. (2018). Indonesian foreign policy and the D-8: Between Islam and economics. *Contemporary Southeast Asia*, 40(2), 229-253.
Beeson, M., & Li, F. (2015). What consensus? Geopolitics and policy paradigms in China and the United States. *International Affairs*, 91(1), 93-109.
Gray, K., & Gills, B. K. (2016). South-South cooperation and the rise of the Global South. *Third World Quarterly*, 37(4), 557-574.
Alden, C., & Vieira, M. A. (2005). The new diplomacy of the South: South Africa, Brazil, India and trilateralism. *Third World Quarterly*, 26(7), 1077-1095.
Horner, R., & Hulme, D. (2019). From international to global development: New geographies of 21st century development. *Development and Change*, 50(2), 347-378.
Jessop, B. (2004). Critical semiotic analysis and cultural political economy. *Critical Discourse Studies*, 1(2), 159-174.
Sum, N. L., & Jessop, B. (2013). *Towards a cultural political economy: Putting culture in its place in political economy*. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Hay, C. (2011). Ideas and the construction of interests. In D. Béland & R. H. Cox (Eds.), *Ideas and politics in social science research* (pp. 65-82). Oxford University Press.
Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. *Annual Review of Political Science*, 11, 303-326.
Paltridge, B. (2012). *Discourse analysis: An introduction* (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury.
Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. J. (2002). *Discourse analysis as theory and method*. SAGE Publications.
Gee, J. P. (2014). *An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method* (4th ed.). Routledge.
Published
2026-02-07
How to Cite
Nur Amalia Putri, Istanti Hermagustiana, & Aridah Aridah. (2026). Narrating Unity and Power: Economic Discourse as Ideological Text in President Prabowo’s D-8 Summit Speech. International Journal of Education, Vocational and Social Science , 5(01), 607-622. https://doi.org/10.63922/ijevss.v5i01.2775