Predicting Organizational Citizenship Behavior Through Culture, Personality, and Transformational Leadership

Yosef Irianto Segu; Isman Kadar; Rita Retnowati

doi:10.63922/ijevss.v5i02.3153

Yosef Irianto Segu Universitas Pakuan, Bogor, Indonesia
Isman Kadar Universitas Pakuan, Bogor, Indonesia
Rita Retnowati Universitas Pakuan, Bogor, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63922/ijevss.v5i02.3153

Keywords: Organizational Citizenship Behavior, mutual cooperation, transformational leadership

Abstract

This study examines Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) as a key determinant of organizational effectiveness within the Mardi Yuana Foundation, which operates under competitive pressures and resource constraints. OCB has gained increasing importance in modern organizational transformation, as highlighted by Deloitte (2023), reporting a 23% productivity increase in highly engaged organizations, and Kim and Park (2022), emphasizing OCB’s role in resilience and innovation. This research aims to analyze both direct and indirect effects of mutual cooperation, organizational culture, personality, and transformational leadership on OCB, as well as to identify priority improvement areas using the SITOREM approach. A quantitative survey method was employed involving 138 respondents selected through proportional random sampling. Data were analyzed using Path Analysis and SITOREM. The findings reveal that mutual cooperation has a significant positive direct effect on OCB (β=0.603), while organizational culture, personality, and transformational leadership do not have significant direct effects. However, all variables demonstrate significant indirect effects through transformational leadership as a mediating variable. This study contributes by providing an integrative, evidence-based model and actionable insights for enhancing OCB strategically.

References

Adnas, M., Rahman, A., & Putra, D. (2024). Application of Slovin formula in determining sample size. International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, 9(1), 12–18.
Anggraini, D. (2024). Quantitative research methods in educational studies. Journal of Educational Research, 12(1), 45–56.
Astuty, I., & Udin, U. (2020). The effect of transformational leadership on organizational citizenship behavior. Management Science Letters, 10(12), 2781–2788. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.4.012
Banks, G. C., McCauley, K. D., Gardner, W. L., & Guler, C. E. (2021). A meta-analytic review of transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(9), 1343–1370. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000812
Deloitte. (2023). Global human capital trends 2023. https://www.deloitte.com
ECRTD. (2021). Research methods in education. https://www.eajournals.org
Ghozali, I. (2021). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 26 (10th ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Hardhienata, S. (2017). The development of scientific identification theory to conduct operation research in education management (SITOREM). Journal of Education and Learning, 11(4), 403–410.
Hidayat, R., Setyaningsih, S., & Hardhienata, S. (2022). Application of SITOREM method in educational management research. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15219a
Hossan, C. G., Sarker, M. A., & Afroze, R. (2023). Quantitative research methodology and data analysis. Heliyon, 9(5), e15023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15023
Judge, T. A., Klinger, R. L., Simon, L. S., & Yang, I. W. F. (2021). The contributions of personality to organizational behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8, 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-055422
Kim, S., & Park, Y. (2022). The role of organizational citizenship behavior in enhancing resilience and innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(5), 789–804. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2590
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
Nguyen, T. T., Mia, L., Winata, L., & Chong, V. K. (2021). Effect of organizational culture on organizational citizenship behavior. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38(2), 523–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09681-5
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600307
Prasetyo, A., & Kistyanto, A. (2022). Organizational culture and its impact on OCB. Management Science Letters, 12(3), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2021.10.005
Setyaningsih, S. (2024). SITOREM approach in educational performance improvement. Journal of Educational Management, 18(1), 1–10.
Sutanto, E. M., Suyanto, M., & Handayani, R. (2021). The role of organizational citizenship behavior in improving educational service quality. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(6), 1234–1248. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-01-2021-0023
Zhang, Y., Li, X., & Zhao, H. (2023). Personality traits and organizational citizenship behavior: A moderated mediation model. Personality and Individual Differences, 200, 111890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111890