G Gender Disparity Analysis In The Distribution Of Inheritance Assets In Pujut District: A Study On The Allocation Of Movable And Immovable Property
Keywords:
gender disparity, inheritance, movable property, immovable property, structural functionalism, Sasak community
Abstract
This study analyzes gender disparity in the distribution of inheritance assets among the Sasak ethnic community in Pujut District, Central Lombok, focusing on the allocation of movable and immovable property. Discriminatory inheritance practices against women have persisted intergenerationally, where men dominate ownership of strategic assets such as land and houses, while women are restricted to movable property including jewelry and vehicles. Employing a qualitative phenomenological approach with 25 informants selected through purposive and snowball sampling, data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and document review. Thematic analysis was conducted using Talcott Parsons' AGIL framework (Adaptation, Goal Attainment, Integration, Latency). Findings reveal that inheritance distribution operates informally outside state legal systems yet follows a highly structured pattern. Land and houses are inherited by male children due to concerns that assets would transfer to the husband's family, while movable property is allocated to daughters. Contributing factors include the patriarchal family structure positioning men as lineage successors, customary law (*awiq-awiq*) legitimizing gender-biased practices, and social sanctions against women claiming inheritance rights. The socio-economic implications include women's inability to access productive assets resulting in structural poverty, economic dependency on men, and extremely low bargaining power in family decision-making. This study concludes that the customary inheritance system in Pujut serves as a primary instrument for reproducing gender hierarchy and perpetuating patriarchal power relations through the controlled distribution of economic resources.
References
Refrence
Agarwal, B. (1994). A field of one's own: Gender and land rights in South Asia. Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. S. (2022). Social theory and the analysis of social systems (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Ariadi, L. M. (2021). Customary marriage practices and social structure among the Sasak community in Lombok. Asian Journal of Social Science, 49
Banks, S., Cai, T., de Jonge, E., Shears, J., Shum, M., Sobočan, A. M., & Strom, K. (2020). Practising ethically during COVID-19: Social work challenges and responses. International Social Work, 63(5), 569-583.
Barber, B. (2020). The AGIL scheme and contemporary social theory. Sociological Theory, 38(2), 112-130.
Bedner, A., & Van Huis, S. (2020). Plurality of justice in Indonesia: The case of women's access to land. Indonesia Law Review, 10(2), 127-148.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Doubleday.
Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802-1811.
Blackwood, E. (2021). The marriage of convenience: Gendered inheritance and property rights in Indonesia. Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Bourricaud, F. (2019). Talcott Parsons and the theory of social action. European Journal of Social Theory, 22(3), 345-362.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
Bowen, J. R. (2020). Islamic law and gender equality in Southeast Asia: The case of inheritance. American Anthropologist, 122(4), 789-802.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. American Psychological Association.
British Sociological Association. (2021). BSA statement of ethical practice. BSA.
Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke's approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391-1412.
Carcary, M. (2020). The research audit trail: Enhancing trustworthiness in qualitative inquiry. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 18(1), 45-58.
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2020). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 47(5), 545-547.
Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807-815.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Deflem, M. (2019). Sociology of law: Visions of a scholarly tradition. Cambridge University Press.
Denscombe, M. (2021). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects (7th ed.). Open University Press.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE.
Dhakal, K. (2022). NVivo in qualitative data analysis. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 11(1), 215-221.
Doss, C., Meinzen-Dick, R., Quisumbing, A., & Theis, S. (2022). Women's land rights and empowerment. World Development, 158, 105-119.
Durkheim, E. (1984). The division of labor in society (W. D. Halls, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1893)
Finlay, L. (2021). Phenomenology for therapists: Researching the lived world. Wiley-Blackwell.
Firmansyah, D., & Rohman, T. (2023). Adat law transformation in Sasak community: Between tradition and modernity. Asian Ethnicity, 24(2), 201-219.
Fitriani, L. (2025). Women's access to immovable property in plural legal systems. International Journal of Law in Context, 21(1), 45-63.
Fitriyanti, F., Diana, S., Pasaribu, Y. M., & Hasan, M. (2025). Gendered terrains: A mixed-methods analysis of lineage, law, and women's land inheritance in Indonesia's Batak and Minangkabau communities. Enigma in Law, 3(1), 50-61.
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE.
Fusch, P. I., Fusch, G. E., & Ness, L. R. (2018). Denzin's paradigm shift: Revisiting triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Social Change, 10(1), 19-32.
Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLoS ONE, 15(5), e0232076.
Gunawan Salim, A., Hakim, L., & Widiastuti, T. (2024). Implementation of inheritance distribution based on Sasak customary law in Rembitan Village. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 9(1), 145-172.
Hakim, N., & Farida, U. (2025). Transforming gender hierarchies through inheritance reform. Gender & Society, 39(2), 245-267.
Hanim, L., & Zuhriah, E. (2023). Economic marginalization of women through customary inheritance practices. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 40(2), 178-196.
Hasan, M., & Azizah, N. (2023). Farā'iḍ and its implementation in contemporary Indonesia. Islamic Law and Society, 30(4), 401-428.
Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523.
Holmwood, J. (2022). Parsons' AGIL scheme and the sociology of modernity. Journal of Classical Sociology, 22(2), 145-163.
Israel, M. (2015). Research ethics and integrity for social scientists: Beyond regulatory compliance (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Jensen, S. (2021). Adaptation and system maintenance in contemporary social theory. Acta Sociologica, 64(2), 201-218.
Joas, H., & Knöbl, W. (2021). Social theory: Twenty introductory lectures. Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, J. L., Adkins, D., & Chauvin, S. (2020). A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(1), 7120.
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: A guide to conducting semi-structured interviews. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(10), 2614-2627.
Kawulich, B. B. (2005). Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), Art. 43.
Kieran, C., Sproule, K., Doss, C., Quisumbing, A., & Ghebru, H. (2025). Gender and land inheritance in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Development Economics, 172, 103-118.
Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120-124.
Kusumawati, D., & Hidayat, S. (2022). Kinship structure and women's inheritance outcomes in Eastern Indonesia. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 178(2-3), 215-241.
Lidz, V. (2020). Talcott Parsons: The social system. In H. Staubmann (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of Talcott Parsons studies (pp. 45-62). Routledge.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2020). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (6th ed., pp. 108-150). SAGE.
MacDonald, J. R., Gormley, G. J., & Murphy, P. (2022). Inter-coder reliability in qualitative analysis: A practical guide. Medical Teacher, 44(5), 497-503.
Mahmudah, R. (2025). Multidimensional gender inequality in inheritance systems. Feminist Economics, 31(1), 89-112.
Markham, A. N., & Buchanan, E. (2019). Ethical decision-making in internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research, 9, 1-18.
McIntosh, M. J., & Morse, J. M. (2015). Situating and constructing diversity in semi-structured interviews. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 2, 1-12.
Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting qualitative research using documentary analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(7), 1565-1579.
Mulyani, S., & Fatimah, E. (2024). Socio-economic consequences of unequal inheritance for rural women. World Development, 165, 106-121.
Munch, R. (2019). Parsons' action theory and the theory of social systems. Sociologia Internationalis, 57(1), 45-68.
Musante, K., & DeWalt, B. R. (2010). Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers (2nd ed.). AltaMira Press.
Mustafa, Z., & Hamid, A. (2024). Customary law versus state law in Indonesian inheritance disputes. Law & Society Review, 58(2), 234-259.
Nasution, F. A. (2022). Women's subordination through property deprivation: An Indonesian case study. Asian Journal of Social Science, 50(3), 189-202.
Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(2), 90-97.
Ningsih, W. (2024). Egalitarian transformation in customary inheritance systems. Journal of Agrarian Change, 24(1), e12478.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-13.
Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327-344.
Nurhayati, S., & Khasanah, U. (2025). Research methods in customary inheritance studies. Qualitative Research, 25(2), 312-330.
O'Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1-13.
Olmos-Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., & Kahlke, R. (2022). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research. Medical Teacher, 44(11), 1191-1199.
Ortlipp, M. (2008). Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 695-705.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533-544.
Parker, C., Scott, S., & Geddes, A. (2019). Snowball sampling. In P. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Cernat, J. W. Sakshaug, & R. A. Williams (Eds.), SAGE research methods foundations. SAGE.
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Free Press.
Parsons, T. (1964). Social structure and personality. Free Press.
Parsons, T. (1971). The system of modern societies. Prentice-Hall.
Parsons, T., & Shils, E. A. (Eds.). (1951). Toward a general theory of action. Harvard University Press.
Parsons, T., & Smelser, N. J. (1956). Economy and society: A study in the integration of economic and social theory. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE.
Pradana, A. (2024). Property ownership and gender in Central Lombok. Indonesia and the Malay World, 52(152), 55-74.
Prasetyo, B., & Lestari, T. (2025). Generational shifts in attitudes toward customary inheritance. Journal of Family Issues, 46(3), 567-589.
Pujiati, D., & Wahyuni, S. (2025). Research gaps in Indonesian inheritance studies: A systematic review. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 12(1), 101-123.
Rachman, T., & Sari, M. (2024). Kinship systems and economic resource allocation in Indonesia. Economic Anthropology, 11(2), 198-214.
Rahardjo, S. (2021). Ilmu hukum dan sosiologi hukum: Refleksi teoritis. Rajawali Pers.
Rahayu, S. (2025). Land dispossession and women's dependency in patrilineal communities. Journal of Peasant Studies, 52(2), 345-367.
Rahmawati, A. (2024). CEDAW implementation in Indonesia: Progress and persistent challenges. Human Rights Review, 25(1), 67-89.
Resnik, D. B. (2020). What is ethics in research & why is it important? In The ethics of research with human subjects (pp. 1-10). Springer.
Rizki, M., & Lestari, D. (2025). Problem formulation in socio-legal research on inheritance. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 28(2), 189-205.
Robertson, R. (2020). Parsons and the globalization paradigm. Globalizations, 17(4), 678-694.
Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25-41.
Salim, A., Firdaus, M., & Hasanah, U. (2024). Discriminatory patterns in Sasak customary inheritance. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 56(1), 78-99.
Sciortino, G. (2021). The AGIL paradigm and its critics: A reassessment. Sociological Theory, 39(2), 89-108.
Setiawan, B., & Kurniawati, D. (2024). Asset ownership and family dynamics in patrilineal societies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 86(2), 445-463.
Sloan, A., & Bowe, B. (2014). Phenomenology and hermeneutic phenomenology: The philosophy, the methodologies, and using hermeneutic phenomenology to investigate lecturers' experiences of curriculum design. Quality & Quantity, 48(3), 1291-1303.
Smith, J. A., & Nizza, I. E. (2022). Essentials of interpretative phenomenological analysis. American Psychological Association.
Soekanto, S. (2014). Sosiologi hukum dalam masyarakat. Rajawali Pers.
Sofyan, A., & Dewi, K. (2024). Cyclical disempowerment through inheritance denial. Gender, Place & Culture, 31(4), 512-531.
Suharsono, A., Prasetyoningsih, N., & Usman, S. (2024). Women's inheritance rights in Indonesia from the perspective of the triangular concept of legal pluralism. El-Mashlahah, 14(2), 259-282.
Suryani, N. (2024). Socio-economic implications of gender disparity in inheritance. Asian Economic Journal, 38(2), 145-168.
Syukur, M. (2024). Islamic law and customary law in comparative perspective: Sasak inheritance practices. Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 62(1), 89-121.
Thomas, D. R. (2017). Feedback from research participants: Member checking and participant validation as a validation strategy. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(4), 397-409.
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight "big-tent" criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837-851.
Travers, M. (2022). Understanding law and society (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Treviño, A. J. (2017). The sociology of Talcott Parsons: The social system reader. SAGE.
Tuffour, I. (2017). A critical overview of interpretative phenomenological analysis: A contemporary qualitative research approach. Journal of Healthcare Communications, 2(4), 52-58.
Turner, J. H. (2020). The continuing relevance of Talcott Parsons' structural functionalism. Sociological Perspectives, 63(5), 789-806.
Utami, T., & Handayani, S. (2024). Inheritance disparity as a tool for reproducing gender inequality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 49(3), 621-646.
van Manen, M. (2023). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., & Young, T. (2018). Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 148.
Wibowo, A., & Sulastri, R. (2023). Legal protection for women in customary inheritance systems. Journal of Indonesian Law, 4(1), 33-55.
Wulandari, D. (2023). Traditional elders and resistance to inheritance reform in Lombok. Asian Journal of Anthropology, 22(2), 167-186.
Yusmita, Y., Sitorus, I. R., Shesa, L., Septiana Rachman, E., & Lumatus Sa'adah, S. (2025). Legal pluralism and the transformation of Islamic inheritance law: A study of Sasak customary practices in Indonesia. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 10(2), 831-852.
Zahavi, D. (2020). Phenomenology: The basics. Routledge.
Zainuddin, M., & Maulidya, R. (2024). Islamic inheritance law and women's rights in contemporary Indonesia. Studia Islamika, 31(1), 45-78.
Zuhro, R., & Anwar, K. (2024). Unjust inheritance systems and their socio-economic implications. Critical Asian Studies, 56(2), 234-256.
Zwitter, A., Herman, J., & Boisse-de Chazournes, L. (2020). The GDPR and its application to research. Cambridge University Press.
Agarwal, B. (1994). A field of one's own: Gender and land rights in South Asia. Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. S. (2022). Social theory and the analysis of social systems (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Ariadi, L. M. (2021). Customary marriage practices and social structure among the Sasak community in Lombok. Asian Journal of Social Science, 49
Banks, S., Cai, T., de Jonge, E., Shears, J., Shum, M., Sobočan, A. M., & Strom, K. (2020). Practising ethically during COVID-19: Social work challenges and responses. International Social Work, 63(5), 569-583.
Barber, B. (2020). The AGIL scheme and contemporary social theory. Sociological Theory, 38(2), 112-130.
Bedner, A., & Van Huis, S. (2020). Plurality of justice in Indonesia: The case of women's access to land. Indonesia Law Review, 10(2), 127-148.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Doubleday.
Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802-1811.
Blackwood, E. (2021). The marriage of convenience: Gendered inheritance and property rights in Indonesia. Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Bourricaud, F. (2019). Talcott Parsons and the theory of social action. European Journal of Social Theory, 22(3), 345-362.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
Bowen, J. R. (2020). Islamic law and gender equality in Southeast Asia: The case of inheritance. American Anthropologist, 122(4), 789-802.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. American Psychological Association.
British Sociological Association. (2021). BSA statement of ethical practice. BSA.
Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke's approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391-1412.
Carcary, M. (2020). The research audit trail: Enhancing trustworthiness in qualitative inquiry. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 18(1), 45-58.
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2020). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 47(5), 545-547.
Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807-815.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Deflem, M. (2019). Sociology of law: Visions of a scholarly tradition. Cambridge University Press.
Denscombe, M. (2021). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects (7th ed.). Open University Press.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE.
Dhakal, K. (2022). NVivo in qualitative data analysis. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 11(1), 215-221.
Doss, C., Meinzen-Dick, R., Quisumbing, A., & Theis, S. (2022). Women's land rights and empowerment. World Development, 158, 105-119.
Durkheim, E. (1984). The division of labor in society (W. D. Halls, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1893)
Finlay, L. (2021). Phenomenology for therapists: Researching the lived world. Wiley-Blackwell.
Firmansyah, D., & Rohman, T. (2023). Adat law transformation in Sasak community: Between tradition and modernity. Asian Ethnicity, 24(2), 201-219.
Fitriani, L. (2025). Women's access to immovable property in plural legal systems. International Journal of Law in Context, 21(1), 45-63.
Fitriyanti, F., Diana, S., Pasaribu, Y. M., & Hasan, M. (2025). Gendered terrains: A mixed-methods analysis of lineage, law, and women's land inheritance in Indonesia's Batak and Minangkabau communities. Enigma in Law, 3(1), 50-61.
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE.
Fusch, P. I., Fusch, G. E., & Ness, L. R. (2018). Denzin's paradigm shift: Revisiting triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Social Change, 10(1), 19-32.
Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLoS ONE, 15(5), e0232076.
Gunawan Salim, A., Hakim, L., & Widiastuti, T. (2024). Implementation of inheritance distribution based on Sasak customary law in Rembitan Village. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 9(1), 145-172.
Hakim, N., & Farida, U. (2025). Transforming gender hierarchies through inheritance reform. Gender & Society, 39(2), 245-267.
Hanim, L., & Zuhriah, E. (2023). Economic marginalization of women through customary inheritance practices. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 40(2), 178-196.
Hasan, M., & Azizah, N. (2023). Farā'iḍ and its implementation in contemporary Indonesia. Islamic Law and Society, 30(4), 401-428.
Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523.
Holmwood, J. (2022). Parsons' AGIL scheme and the sociology of modernity. Journal of Classical Sociology, 22(2), 145-163.
Israel, M. (2015). Research ethics and integrity for social scientists: Beyond regulatory compliance (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Jensen, S. (2021). Adaptation and system maintenance in contemporary social theory. Acta Sociologica, 64(2), 201-218.
Joas, H., & Knöbl, W. (2021). Social theory: Twenty introductory lectures. Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, J. L., Adkins, D., & Chauvin, S. (2020). A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(1), 7120.
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: A guide to conducting semi-structured interviews. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(10), 2614-2627.
Kawulich, B. B. (2005). Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), Art. 43.
Kieran, C., Sproule, K., Doss, C., Quisumbing, A., & Ghebru, H. (2025). Gender and land inheritance in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Development Economics, 172, 103-118.
Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120-124.
Kusumawati, D., & Hidayat, S. (2022). Kinship structure and women's inheritance outcomes in Eastern Indonesia. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 178(2-3), 215-241.
Lidz, V. (2020). Talcott Parsons: The social system. In H. Staubmann (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of Talcott Parsons studies (pp. 45-62). Routledge.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2020). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (6th ed., pp. 108-150). SAGE.
MacDonald, J. R., Gormley, G. J., & Murphy, P. (2022). Inter-coder reliability in qualitative analysis: A practical guide. Medical Teacher, 44(5), 497-503.
Mahmudah, R. (2025). Multidimensional gender inequality in inheritance systems. Feminist Economics, 31(1), 89-112.
Markham, A. N., & Buchanan, E. (2019). Ethical decision-making in internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research, 9, 1-18.
McIntosh, M. J., & Morse, J. M. (2015). Situating and constructing diversity in semi-structured interviews. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 2, 1-12.
Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting qualitative research using documentary analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(7), 1565-1579.
Mulyani, S., & Fatimah, E. (2024). Socio-economic consequences of unequal inheritance for rural women. World Development, 165, 106-121.
Munch, R. (2019). Parsons' action theory and the theory of social systems. Sociologia Internationalis, 57(1), 45-68.
Musante, K., & DeWalt, B. R. (2010). Participant observation: A guide for fieldworkers (2nd ed.). AltaMira Press.
Mustafa, Z., & Hamid, A. (2024). Customary law versus state law in Indonesian inheritance disputes. Law & Society Review, 58(2), 234-259.
Nasution, F. A. (2022). Women's subordination through property deprivation: An Indonesian case study. Asian Journal of Social Science, 50(3), 189-202.
Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(2), 90-97.
Ningsih, W. (2024). Egalitarian transformation in customary inheritance systems. Journal of Agrarian Change, 24(1), e12478.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-13.
Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327-344.
Nurhayati, S., & Khasanah, U. (2025). Research methods in customary inheritance studies. Qualitative Research, 25(2), 312-330.
O'Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1-13.
Olmos-Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., & Kahlke, R. (2022). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research. Medical Teacher, 44(11), 1191-1199.
Ortlipp, M. (2008). Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 695-705.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533-544.
Parker, C., Scott, S., & Geddes, A. (2019). Snowball sampling. In P. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Cernat, J. W. Sakshaug, & R. A. Williams (Eds.), SAGE research methods foundations. SAGE.
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Free Press.
Parsons, T. (1964). Social structure and personality. Free Press.
Parsons, T. (1971). The system of modern societies. Prentice-Hall.
Parsons, T., & Shils, E. A. (Eds.). (1951). Toward a general theory of action. Harvard University Press.
Parsons, T., & Smelser, N. J. (1956). Economy and society: A study in the integration of economic and social theory. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE.
Pradana, A. (2024). Property ownership and gender in Central Lombok. Indonesia and the Malay World, 52(152), 55-74.
Prasetyo, B., & Lestari, T. (2025). Generational shifts in attitudes toward customary inheritance. Journal of Family Issues, 46(3), 567-589.
Pujiati, D., & Wahyuni, S. (2025). Research gaps in Indonesian inheritance studies: A systematic review. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 12(1), 101-123.
Rachman, T., & Sari, M. (2024). Kinship systems and economic resource allocation in Indonesia. Economic Anthropology, 11(2), 198-214.
Rahardjo, S. (2021). Ilmu hukum dan sosiologi hukum: Refleksi teoritis. Rajawali Pers.
Rahayu, S. (2025). Land dispossession and women's dependency in patrilineal communities. Journal of Peasant Studies, 52(2), 345-367.
Rahmawati, A. (2024). CEDAW implementation in Indonesia: Progress and persistent challenges. Human Rights Review, 25(1), 67-89.
Resnik, D. B. (2020). What is ethics in research & why is it important? In The ethics of research with human subjects (pp. 1-10). Springer.
Rizki, M., & Lestari, D. (2025). Problem formulation in socio-legal research on inheritance. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 28(2), 189-205.
Robertson, R. (2020). Parsons and the globalization paradigm. Globalizations, 17(4), 678-694.
Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25-41.
Salim, A., Firdaus, M., & Hasanah, U. (2024). Discriminatory patterns in Sasak customary inheritance. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 56(1), 78-99.
Sciortino, G. (2021). The AGIL paradigm and its critics: A reassessment. Sociological Theory, 39(2), 89-108.
Setiawan, B., & Kurniawati, D. (2024). Asset ownership and family dynamics in patrilineal societies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 86(2), 445-463.
Sloan, A., & Bowe, B. (2014). Phenomenology and hermeneutic phenomenology: The philosophy, the methodologies, and using hermeneutic phenomenology to investigate lecturers' experiences of curriculum design. Quality & Quantity, 48(3), 1291-1303.
Smith, J. A., & Nizza, I. E. (2022). Essentials of interpretative phenomenological analysis. American Psychological Association.
Soekanto, S. (2014). Sosiologi hukum dalam masyarakat. Rajawali Pers.
Sofyan, A., & Dewi, K. (2024). Cyclical disempowerment through inheritance denial. Gender, Place & Culture, 31(4), 512-531.
Suharsono, A., Prasetyoningsih, N., & Usman, S. (2024). Women's inheritance rights in Indonesia from the perspective of the triangular concept of legal pluralism. El-Mashlahah, 14(2), 259-282.
Suryani, N. (2024). Socio-economic implications of gender disparity in inheritance. Asian Economic Journal, 38(2), 145-168.
Syukur, M. (2024). Islamic law and customary law in comparative perspective: Sasak inheritance practices. Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 62(1), 89-121.
Thomas, D. R. (2017). Feedback from research participants: Member checking and participant validation as a validation strategy. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(4), 397-409.
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight "big-tent" criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837-851.
Travers, M. (2022). Understanding law and society (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Treviño, A. J. (2017). The sociology of Talcott Parsons: The social system reader. SAGE.
Tuffour, I. (2017). A critical overview of interpretative phenomenological analysis: A contemporary qualitative research approach. Journal of Healthcare Communications, 2(4), 52-58.
Turner, J. H. (2020). The continuing relevance of Talcott Parsons' structural functionalism. Sociological Perspectives, 63(5), 789-806.
Utami, T., & Handayani, S. (2024). Inheritance disparity as a tool for reproducing gender inequality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 49(3), 621-646.
van Manen, M. (2023). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., & Young, T. (2018). Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 148.
Wibowo, A., & Sulastri, R. (2023). Legal protection for women in customary inheritance systems. Journal of Indonesian Law, 4(1), 33-55.
Wulandari, D. (2023). Traditional elders and resistance to inheritance reform in Lombok. Asian Journal of Anthropology, 22(2), 167-186.
Yusmita, Y., Sitorus, I. R., Shesa, L., Septiana Rachman, E., & Lumatus Sa'adah, S. (2025). Legal pluralism and the transformation of Islamic inheritance law: A study of Sasak customary practices in Indonesia. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 10(2), 831-852.
Zahavi, D. (2020). Phenomenology: The basics. Routledge.
Zainuddin, M., & Maulidya, R. (2024). Islamic inheritance law and women's rights in contemporary Indonesia. Studia Islamika, 31(1), 45-78.
Zuhro, R., & Anwar, K. (2024). Unjust inheritance systems and their socio-economic implications. Critical Asian Studies, 56(2), 234-256.
Zwitter, A., Herman, J., & Boisse-de Chazournes, L. (2020). The GDPR and its application to research. Cambridge University Press.
Published
2026-05-30
How to Cite
Suarjana, & Muhammad Hamdi. (2026). G Gender Disparity Analysis In The Distribution Of Inheritance Assets In Pujut District: A Study On The Allocation Of Movable And Immovable Property. International Journal of Education, Vocational and Social Science , 5(02), 3220-3239. https://doi.org/10.63922/ijevss.v5i02.3926
Contact Person +6282139474255
Email : ijevss@citakonsultindo.or.id / editor.ijevss@gmail.com
