Development of the DJOR Model for Personalized Learning in Teacher Education

  • Wiputra Cendana Universitas Pelita Harapan, Indonesia
  • Lindawati Universitas Pelita Harapan, Indonesia
  • Budi Wibawanta Universitas Pelita Harapan, Indonesia
  • Khoe Yao Tung Universitas Pelita Harapan, Indonesia
Keywords: Instructional design, metacognition, personalized learning, self-regulated learning

Abstract

The increasing diversity of learners and rapid technological developments have prompted higher education institutions to reconsider conventional instructional approaches. Teacher education programs, particularly in elementary teacher preparation, require pedagogical models that foster adaptive learning, reflective thinking, and self-regulated learning. However, many instructional practices in teacher education remain dominated by standardized teaching approaches that do not adequately address learner variability. This study proposes the Draft–Judge–Own–Reflect (DJOR) Personalized Learning Model as an instructional design framework aimed at enhancing personalized learning experiences for teacher candidates. The model integrates principles from cognitive learning theory, social constructivism, self-regulated learning, and metacognition into a systematic instructional structure. Using a design-based research approach, the study develops and evaluates the DJOR model in the context of an elementary teacher education program. The model consists of four iterative phases: Draft, Judge, Own, and Reflect, each designed to support progressive knowledge construction, collaborative evaluation, personal internalization, and metacognitive reflection. Preliminary findings indicate that the DJOR model promotes higher levels of learning engagement, reflective thinking, and self-regulated learning among teacher candidates. The model also demonstrates potential for integrating learning analytics and artificial intelligence to support adaptive learning pathways. This study contributes to the literature by proposing a theoretically grounded personalized learning model specifically designed for teacher education contexts. The findings provide implications for instructional design, teacher professional development, and future research on personalized learning in higher education.

 

References

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.
Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2023). How teacher education matters (Reprint from Journal of Teacher Education, Vol 51, pg 166-173 2000). Journal of Teacher Education, 74(2), 151–156.
Dede, C. (2014). The role of digital technologies in deeper learning. Students at the Center: Deeper Learning Research Series. Harvard University.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–16.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2014). Authentic learning environments. In J. M. Spector et al. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 401–412). Springer.
Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models (Vol. 2, pp. 215–239). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. Routledge.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Published
2026-05-28
How to Cite
Cendana, W., Lindawati, Budi Wibawanta, & Khoe Yao Tung. (2026). Development of the DJOR Model for Personalized Learning in Teacher Education. International Journal of Education, Vocational and Social Science , 5(02), 3034-3052. https://doi.org/10.63922/ijevss.v5i02.3943