Model of PAI Learning Based on Authentic Arabic Texts: Efforts to Overcome the Decontextualization of Naqli Evidence among Madrasah Students in the Weda Mining Circle  Region, Central Halmahera

Muhammad Ridha Assagaf; Kamarun M.Sebe; Ibrahim Muhammad; Rosdiana Im; Khalid  Hasan Minabari

doi:10.63922/ijevss.v5i03.4459

Muhammad Ridha Assagaf IAIN Ternate, Maluku Utara.Indonesia
Kamarun M.Sebe IAIN Ternate, Maluku Utara Indonesia
Ibrahim Muhammad IAIN Ternate, Maluku Utara Indonesia
Rosdiana Im IAIN Ternate, Maluku Utara Indonesia
Khalid Hasan Minabari IAIN Ternate, Maluku Utara Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63922/ijevss.v5i03.4459

Keywords: : Dalil Naqli Decontextualization; Authentic Arabic Texts; PAI; PBA; Mining Ring Community; CLIL; Central Halmahera.

Abstract

This study investigates the phenomenon of dalil naqli decontextualization among madrasah students in the mining ring community of Weda, Central Halmahera—a region undergoing massive global-scale nickel industrialisation through the presence of PT Indonesia Weda Bay Industrial Park (IWIP). Students in this area are capable of memorising Qur'anic verses and hadiths related to environmental ethics, work ethics, and social morality, yet systematically fail to contextualise these textual resources against the crises unfolding in their immediate surroundings, a failure rooted in the structural separation between Islamic Religious Education (PAI) and Arabic Language Education (PBA). Employing a Research and Development (R&D) design within a multidisciplinary collaborative framework between the PBA and PAI programmes at IAIN Ternate, this study proposes the PAI Learning Model Based on Authentic Arabic Texts (MPA-TAA) as an interdisciplinary solution. The model synthesises principles from critical sociolinguistics, Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL), contextual teaching theory, and critical discourse analysis of religious texts, repositioning authentic Arabic texts as linguistic-hermeneutical instruments through which dalil naqli is contextualised against the sociological realities of the mining zone. This research is expected to contribute to the development of an integrative Islamic education paradigm for extractive-industrial zones in the island territories of Eastern Indonesi

References

Adji, G. N., & Pariela, M. V. G. (2023). Pertanggung Jawaban PT. Indonesia Weda Bay Industrial Park Atas Kerusakan Lingkungan Hidup. PATTIMURA Law Study Review, 1(1), 28–36.
Ahmad, J., & Manusia, A. P. K. (2018). Paradigma pendidikan Islam: Upaya Mengefektifkan Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah. Pasca Sarjana UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, 3, 320.
Atabik, A. (2021). AL-NAẒM STYLISTIC DISCOURSE IN I’JĀZ AL- QUR’ĀN BASED ON AL-JURJĀNĪ’S PERSPECTIVE: Analysis of Arabic Literature Criticism on the Qur’an Studies. Ulumuna, 25(1), 57–83.
Azra, A. (2019). Pendidikan Islam: Tradisi dan modernisasi di tengah tantangan milenium III. Prenada Media.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Ed. Michael Holquist. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: U of Texas P.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986(23–28), 2.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (Vol. 11). Freeman.
Beers, P. J., Van Mierlo, B., & Hoes, A. C. (2016). Toward an integrative perspective on social learning in system innovation initiatives. Ecology and Society, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08148-210133
Biehler, R. F. (1978). Psychology Applied to Teaching: Instructor’s Manual. Houghton, Mifflin.
Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge University Press.
Bornstein, M. (1971). Alvin Toffler, Future Shock (Book Review). Technology and Culture, 12(3), 532.
Burgess, R. L., & Akers, R. L. (1966). A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social Problems, 14(2), 128–147.
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. routledge.
Downes, S. (2008). An introduction to connective knowledge.
Drakel, A. (2025). DAMPAK PERTAMBANGAN NIKEL TERHADAP LINGKUNGAN DI KABUPATEN HALMAHERA TENGAH. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ekonomi (JUPEK), 7(1), 195–209.
Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of Learning for Instruction (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.
Durkheim, E. (2018). The division of labor in society. In Social stratification (pp. 217–222). Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Language and power. Routledge.
Freire, P. (2020). Pedagogy of the oppressed. In Toward a sociology of education (pp. 374–386). Routledge.
Goldie, J. G. S. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher, 38(10), 1064–1069. tps://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173661
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.
Hallaq, W. B. (1997). A history of Islamic legal theories: An introduction to Sunni Usul al-Fiqh. Cambridge University Press.
Hermawan, A. (2013). Metodologi pembelajaran bahasa Arab.
Heyes, C. (2012). What’s social about social learning? Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025180
John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3–4), 191–206.
Kathleen Dunaway, M. (2011). Connectivism: Learning theory and pedagogical practice for networked information landscapes. Reference Services Review, 39(4), 675–685.
Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i3.523
Kropf, D. C. (2013). Connectivism: 21st Century’s New Learning Theory. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 16(2), 13–24.
Langgulung, H. (1991). Asas-asas pendidikan Islam. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Muhaimin, M. A. (2020). Paradigma Pendidikan Islam. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Piaget, J. (2007). Genetic epistemology.
Sabililhaq, I., Nursiah, A., & Munir, M. (2024). Analysis of Albert Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory and Its Development in Islamic Religious Education. Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal, 6(12), 5498–5512.
Scholz, G., Dewulf, A., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2014). An analytical framework of social learning facilitated by participatory methods. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 27(6), 575–591.
Shum, S. B., & Ferguson, R. (2012). Social learning analytics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 3–26.
Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. elearnspace.
Van Klinken, G., & Berenschot, W. (2014). In search of middle Indonesia. Brill Leiden, The Netherlands.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard university press.