Reorientation of Judicial Review in Upholding the Principles of the Rule of Law: An Analysis of the Strengthening of Constitutional Review in Indonesia
Abstract
This study examines the reorientation of judicial review in strengthening constitutional review in Indonesia as an instrument for upholding the rule of law. Focusing on the dynamics between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court, fragmentation of constitutional interpretation, and the effectiveness of rights protection. The research employs normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches. Findings indicate that the dualistic judicial review system creates interpretative inconsistency and weakens constitutional unity. The Constitutional Court has evolved into a constitutional standard setter through progressive decisions, while the Supreme Court maintains a legal conformity approach. This condition is exacerbated by the absence of an effective judicial dialogue mechanism. Comparative analysis shows that countries with centralized constitutional review systems achieve higher interpretative consistency. This study recommends an integrative constitutional review model based on structural, substantive, and cultural dimensions to strengthen constitutional supremacy and the effectiveness of the democratic rule of law. The model also emphasizes institutional coordination, legislative quality improvement, and constitutional culture development as essential pillars of sustainable constitutional governance in Indonesia and rule of law consolidation theoretical and practical framework.
References
Amanda, F., Yuman, D. A., Canthiqa, K. D., Zulfa, A. N., & Marsal, I. (2025). Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Penjaga Konstitusi Dan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Dalam Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 14(3).
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara Jilid II, Jakarta. In Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan MK RI.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2018). Hukum Tata Negara dan Pilar-Pilar. In Jakarta Timur: Sinar grafika (Vol. 2, Number 1).
Bradlow, J. M. (1988). Procedural Due Process Rights of Pro Se Civil Litigants. The University of Chicago Law Review, 55(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/1599822
Butt, S. (2015). The constitutional court and democracy in Indonesia. In The Constitutional Court and Democracy in Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004250598
Chalid, H. A. (2017). Dualism Of Judicial Review In Indonesia: Problems And Solutions. Indonesia Law Review, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v7n3.353
Constitutions in OECD Countries: A Comparative Study. (2022). In Constitutions in OECD Countries: A Comparative Study. https://doi.org/10.1787/ccb3ca1b-en
Criddle, E. J., & Fox-Decent, E. (2012). Human rights, emergencies, and the rule of law. Human Rights Quarterly, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2012.0001
Gellhorn, W., & Cappelletti, M. (1972). Judicial Review in the Contemporary World. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/838992
GinsburgC, T. (2003). Judicial review in new democracies: Constitutional courts in asian cases. In Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511189
Ginting, B. P., Suganda, A., & Suasungnern, S. (2024). The Concept Of The Rule Of Law In The Indonesian Constitution. Sibatik Journal, 3(12).
Gstrein, O. J., & Beaulieu, A. (2022). How to protect privacy in a datafied society? A presentation of multiple legal and conceptual approaches. Philosophy and Technology, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00497-4
Haryoko Bambang Widjayanto, & Yoga Tri Hartanto. (2025). The Rule Of Law, The Constitution, And Democracy In In-donesian State Administration Practice. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.62951/ijlcj.v2i4.838
Hirschl, R. (2020). Towards Juristocracy. In Towards Juristocracy. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv15d81nb
Jimly, A. (2006). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. In Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI (Vol. 1, Number 1).
Kelsen, H. (2024). Pure theory of law. In Pure Theory of Law. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.13167921
Lina Sinaulan, R., Saputra, R., & Sugeng Sugeng. (2025). The Constitutional Court as a Positive Legislative through the Living Constitution Approach. International Journal of Law and Society, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.62951/ijls.v2i4.780
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2015). Putusan Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015 (versi metadata lengkap).
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2020). Putusan Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja terhadap UUD NRI 1945.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2023). Putusan Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Pemilu terhadap UUD NRI 1945.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2026). Database Putusan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.
Maslul, S. (2023). Judicial Restraint Dalam Pengujian Kewenangan Judicial Review Di Mahkamah Agung. Jurnal Yudisial, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v15i3.496
Qc, M. F. (2020). Judicial Review Handbook. In Judicial Review Handbook. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509943517.0006
R Arif Muljohadi. (2025). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. In Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. https://doi.org/10.62952/pssp.22
Suyanto. (2022). Metode Penelitian Hukum Pengantar Penelitian Normatif, Empiris dan Gabungan. In Sustainability (Switzerland).
Sweet, A. S. (2000). Governing with Judges. Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198297718.001.0001
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2021). Legal pluralism explained: History, theory, consequences. In Legal Pluralism Explained: History, Theory, Consequences. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190861551.001.0001
Tushnet, M. (2017). Advanced Introduction to Comparative Constitutional Law. In Advanced Introduction to Comparative Constitutional Law. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781007327
Umar, K., & Sofyan. (2023). Dinamika Perkembangan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Al Tasyri’iyyah, 3(1).
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (1945).
Winda Indah Wardani, & Laga Sugiarto. (2023). Perbandingan Desain Isu Kewenangan Judicial Review Di Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia Dan Thailand. JAPHTN-HAN, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.55292/japhtnhan.v2i1.55

















Contact Person +6282139474255
Email : ijevss@citakonsultindo.or.id / editor.ijevss@gmail.com