Techno-Institutional Fit in Aceh Patchouli Downstream Industry: Technology Absorptive Capacity and Cooperative Pentahelix Innovation Ecosystem

Irham Maulana; Zulkarnain Lubis; Syaifullah Muhammad

doi:10.63922/ijevss.v5i04.6790

Irham Maulana Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Teuku Umar, Aceh Barat, Indonesia
Zulkarnain Lubis Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Medan Area, Medan, Indonesia
Syaifullah Muhammad Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia and ARC-PUIPT Nilam Universitas Syiah Kuala, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.63922/ijevss.v5i04.6790

Keywords: Absorptive Capacity; Pentahelix Innovation; Patchouli Cooperative; Techno-Institutional Fit; Agroindustry Downstreaming

Abstract

This conceptual study develops a techno-institutional fit model for cooperative-based downstream development of patchouli oil in Aceh, Indonesia. It asks how collaboration among innovation actors could support the organizational learning required to translate technology access into downstream value. The study synthesizes the institutional narrative reported for Aceh's patchouli industry with absorptive-capacity and pentahelix literature. Its evidence consists of reported planning priorities, stakeholder labels, and descriptions of value-chain constraints, rather than independently audited implementation records or cooperative-level measurements. The synthesis identifies four analytical themes: interdependent technical and institutional constraints; a planning sequence linking institutional development and processing innovation; differences in stakeholder classification; and insufficiently specified responsibilities for cooperative learning. Differences between actor labels do not, by themselves, establish the exclusion of cooperative members, while counts of assigned tasks cannot establish institutional effectiveness. The proposed model links pentahelix collaboration to knowledge acquisition and assimilation, then to transformation and exploitation, with techno-institutional fit supporting the conversion of knowledge into organizational practice. Three propositions specify relationships for subsequent empirical investigation. The contribution is a bounded explanation of how cooperative learning routines, member representation, and complementary actor responsibilities could connect innovation support to downstream outcomes. Policy implications emphasize pairing suitable technical investment with capacity-building and accountable follow-up, rather than replacing technical intervention with additional administrative mandates. The model remains a conceptual proposition requiring verification against authenticated documents and cooperative-level evidence.

References

Anggraeni, S. K., Maarif, M. S., Sukardi, & Raharja, S. (2018). Improving the capability of fish processing innovation through innovation system strengthening. Jurnal Teknologi Industri Pertanian, 28(3), 269–278.
Arndt, F., Aharonson, B., Jansen, J., Jiang, J., & Ting, C. (2023). The past and future of absorptive capacity. Academy of Management Collections, 2(4), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.5465/amc.2021.0008
Astrima, A. H., Lona, N. J., Adnyana, W. A., Muflikh, Y. N., & Suprehatin. (2025). Peran inovasi dan teknologi dalam manajemen rantai pasok berkelanjutan pada industri agrifood: Tinjauan literatur sistematis. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia, 13(2), 258–291. https://doi.org/10.29244/jai.2025.13.2.258-291
Bijman, J., Hanisch, M., & van der Sangen, G. (2014). Shifting control? The changes of internal governance in agricultural cooperatives in the EU. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 85(4), 641–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12055
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Calzada, I. (2020). Democratising smart cities? Penta-helix multistakeholder social innovation framework. Smart Cities, 3(4), 1145–1172. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities3040057
Cantika, W. N., Zikri, I., & Hamid, H. (2022). Konstruksi kelembagaan kemitraan agroindustri nilam Aceh Jaya dengan menggunakan pendekatan proses hierarki analitik. Jurnal Bisnis Tani, 8(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.35308/jbt.v8i1.5413
Cholez, C., Pauly, O., Mahdad, M., Mehrabi, S., Giagnocavo, C., & Bijman, J. (2023). Heterogeneity of inter-organizational collaborations in agrifood chain sustainability-oriented innovations. Agricultural Systems, 212, 103774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103774
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
Flatten, T. C., Engelen, A., Zahra, S. A., & Brettel, M. (2011). A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation. European Management Journal, 29(2), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2010.11.002
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
Jansen, J. J. P., van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 999–1015. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.19573106
Kilelu, C. W., Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2013). Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme. Agricultural Systems, 118, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.03.003
Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2008). Matching demand and supply in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure: Experiences with innovation intermediaries. Food Policy, 33(3), 260–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.10.001
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Lubis, Z., & Simanullang, E. S. (2026). Pengaruh mitra usaha melalui kapabilitas petani terhadap pemberdayaan petani kopi di Kabupaten Tapanuli Selatan. Jurnal Agrimansion, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/agrimansion.v27i1.2062
Muhammad, S. (2023). Nilam, from seed to seal: Inovasi berbasis ilmu pengetahuan dari perguruan tinggi ke pasar internasional. ARC-PUI PT Nilam Aceh, Universitas Syiah Kuala, bekerjasama dengan Bandar Publishing.
Pertiwi, A., Mursitama, T. N., Beng, J. T., & Elidjen. (2024). The under-developed social integration mechanism as moderating factor of two-dimensional absorptive capacity relationship: Systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 14(2), 21582440231203904. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231203904
Rosiana, D. S., Agustin, H., Wijaya, H. A. F., Kurniawan, D. S., & Utomo, B. S. (2025). Model peningkatan produktivitas pertanian berbasis kelembagaan. Jurnal Maksipreneur: Manajemen, Koperasi, dan Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 501–516. https://doi.org/10.30588/jmp.v14i2.1777
Silvia, V., Sartiyah, S., Raihan Fitra, M., & Nadira, C. (2023). Determinant of patchouli production in Aceh Jaya Regency Aceh Province. Advances in Decision Sciences, 27(2), 99–121. https://doi.org/10.47654/v27y2023i2p99-121
Ulya, Z., Haikal, M., Lufika, R. D., Vonna, A. G., Mandira, A. S., & Melinda, Z. (2026). Supply chain transparency analysis of patchouli oil industry in Aceh from seed to international market. J@ti Undip: Jurnal Teknik Industri, 21(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.14710/jati.1.1.38-46
Vonna, A. G., Indra, I., & Nugroho, A. (2020). Market analysis of patchouli oil in Aceh Jaya Aceh Province. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(9), 388–400. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i9.2207
Werlang, N., & Fiates, G. (2026). Capacidade absortiva e inovação no agronegócio brasileiro: Um estudo com produtores rurais integrados a uma agroindústria multinacional. Brazilian Journal of Management and Innovation (Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação), 13(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.18226/23190639.v13n1.08
Wigboldus, S., Klerkx, L., Leeuwis, C., Schut, M., Muilerman, S., & Jochemsen, H. (2016). Systemic perspectives on scaling agricultural innovations. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 36, 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0380-z
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995
Zikri, I., Agussabti, A., Akram, M., Indra, I., Kamaruzzaman, S., Mujiburrahmad, M., & Susanti, E. (2022). Farmer empowerment and its contributing factors (a case study of patchouli farmer in Kabupaten Aceh Jaya). Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis, 21(1), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.21.1.147-160